"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again."

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


They had some in Ukraine and then withdrew them so one must assume that they had a serious defect. Can that be fixed in the next 15 months? Who knows but if they send one or two back then they have met their promise.
 
Last edited:


Hey mate

Got a summary of what was there? Seeing Gobble removed the whole account about two hours after your post it should be interesting

1694553687238.png
 
Smart. The canny Swedes are angling for contracts postwar. We may recall that before the Russian invasion that SAAB was looking to have the Gripen license-built in Ukraine.
 
Hey mate

Got a summary of what was there? Seeing Gobble removed the whole account about two hours after your post it should be interesting

View attachment 737382
The vid was about the Challenger tanks Ukraine received from the UK.

The Ukrainian tankers are calling it a "sniper" due to it's accurate long range ability. One of the tankers interviewed claimed they took out a T-55 at a range of 5km, too.
 
Last edited:
I've read in the article that the Abrams needs jet fuel. I've also read elsewhere it can run on any liquid that burns. Which is it?. I'm asking for a friend.
Most turbine engines will run on any flammable liquid, BUT...
The life of the engine will be severely shortened. e.g. The Rolls-Royce 250 series allows avgas as an emergency fuel, but has a limitation of 6 hours per engine overhaul period.

So, you might only want to use that stash of vodka to get home in an emergency.
 
Most turbine engines will run on any flammable liquid, BUT...
The life of the engine will be severely shortened. e.g. The Rolls-Royce 250 series allows avgas as an emergency fuel, but has a limitation of 6 hours per engine overhaul period.

So, you might only want to use that stash of vodka to get home in an emergency.
I beleive the main issue with the Abrams was logistics - the Army wanted to solely operate it on JP4 or JP8 so it didn't have to provide an additional logistic stream just for diesel. This is also where the media gets confused, thinking that the M1 can only operate on jet fuel.

However, the Abrams gets much better mileage with diesel plus the Bradley uses diesel, so the Army changed it's mind.
 
I beleive the main issue with the Abrams was logistics - the Army wanted to solely operate it on JP4 or JP8 so it didn't have to provide an additional logistic stream just for diesel. This is also where the media gets confused, thinking that the M1 can only operate on jet fuel.

However, the Abrams gets much better mileage with diesel plus the Bradley uses diesel, so the Army changed it's mind.
Makes sense. Diesel is a lot closer to JP4 than avgas (or vodka:))...
 
Makes sense. Diesel is a lot closer to JP4 than avgas (or vodka:))...
Interestingly enough, the old Ford Model T was multi-fuel.
Due to it's engine's low compression ratio, the "T" could run on kerosene, benzene, ethanol (this would have been various grades of moonshine back then), coal oil and of course, gasoline.
 
Reports are that Russia at least suffered heavy damage to a Ropucha class landing craft in dry-dock at Sevastopol, and Russian media is also saying a Kilo class submarine in the same dock was "damaged".

Videos and stills show the Ropucha burning in several places across the hull and superstructure. Despite being in dry dock, I'll wager its out of action for some tme.

Seems like a very effective attack.

EDIT: From videos via Russian Telegram accounts, looks like there were at least three missile hits, possibly four. There was maybe another missile that got intercepted by air defense. Lots of SAM activity shown.
 
Last edited:
Most turbine engines will run on any flammable liquid, BUT...
The life of the engine will be severely shortened. e.g. The Rolls-Royce 250 series allows avgas as an emergency fuel, but has a limitation of 6 hours per engine overhaul period.

So, you might only want to use that stash of vodka to get home in an emergency.

Yep, anything which is thin enough to flow and burns hot enough. In the arctic in the 60s we ran all the Twin Otters, etc, on diesel because avtur had a very short drum life whereas diesel has that little bit more oil in it so it lasts much much longer before the drum may start to rust. Plus diesel was available almost everywhere so you only needed a few stashes in the middle of nowhere to support normal ops. You lost a minute amount of payload but the benefits far outweighed the downsides.
 
Those F-16s better arrive before Putin gets those DPRK MiG-15s.
Or those Ilyushin Il-28 Beagles. Honestly, imagine being assigned to fly those things over Ukraine.

In other news, once these newly liberated oil rigs are fitted with anti ship/air and land attack missiles they'll be useful in controlling the sea and hitting Crimea.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back