"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (19 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


473414260_122187071690134694_7522310178491824694_n.jpg
 
 
On the otherhand, little Ukraine has held a world super power at bay with second-hand western weapons and a fraction of the manpower.

I can assure you that Russia, in it's current state, cannon afford to engage front line NATO troops and top-shelf weaponry at the moment.
I highlighted the part I think we easily forget. The AFU's achievement is every bit as impressive as Finland's in 1940. And yes, I know Finland was forced to eventually sue for peace. Russia is not the Soviet Union and has been stymied at virtually every point by an adversary that is far smaller, but superior in practically every other way. Of necessity, Ukraine is a modern Sparta
 
That is what I got, but maybe not all F-35 are operational yet and some of the older types may not be fully operational anymore.

Aircraft TypeTotal Count (Approx.)Type GenerationPrimary Operating European NATO Countries (Approximate Active Fleet)
F-16 Fighting Falcon~4604th GenTurkey (Largest Operator), Greece, Poland, Belgium, Portugal, Romania
Eurofighter Typhoon~4704.5 GenUK (~160), Germany (~143), Italy (~96), Spain (~73)
F-35 Lightning II~1905th GenNorway (~52), Netherlands (~49), UK (~37), Italy (~37), Denmark (~15)
Dassault Rafale~1364.5 GenFrance (~136), Croatia (Acquiring)
Saab JAS-39 Gripen~994/4.5 GenSweden (~75 C/D/E models), Czechia (~12), Hungary (~14-18)
Panavia Tornado~1203.5 GenGermany (~80), Italy (~40)
F/A-18 Hornet~814th GenSpain (~81, EF-18A/B)
MiG-29 Fulcrum~244th GenPoland (~11-14), Bulgaria (~10-13)
McDonnell Douglas F-4~363rd GenGreece (~17), Turkey (~19, Terminator 2020)
Total Operational Fleet~1,690+

But anyway it's a lot of air power.
Add to that, NATO bombers, missile weapons (air, surface and ship launched), airborne electronic warfare aircraft and naval support from the Med and Baltic.
 
Most of my believable intel comes from postings on this forum. Ukraine's drones seem to fly into Russian bases at will and blast aircraft and supplies. The air defense seems to be civilians filming flying drones with phones.
Russian air defense can't protect them essentially militarized Cessnas. In fact, a 172 made it to Moscow at the height(?) of Soviet air defense in 1987!

IMG_5314.jpeg
 
Russian air defense can't protect them essentially militarized Cessnas. In fact, a 172 made it to Moscow at the height(?) of Soviet air defense in 1987!

View attachment 849291
Frank Eugene Corder did the same seven years later. Intoxicated, Corder died in his attempt, but he got his Cessna onto the White House grounds uncontested. I wonder how many other Cessnas have infiltrated civilian government compounds?
 
Last edited:

The oil loading ports like St Petersburg would be better targets than the bridge although not as symbolic.

Although the port could possibly be quickly fixed if a couple of tankers were damaged or destroyed in the attack the oil smugglers crews would start looking for safer occupations.
 
Frank Eugene Corder did the same seven years later. Intoxicated, Corder died in his attempt, but he got his Cessna onto the White House grounds uncontested. I wonder how many other Cessnas have infiltrated civilian government compounds?

I wonder how many drones have destroyed Russian assets ranging far and deep. I wonder how stuff thirty years ago is relevant to what is going on now. I wonder how Russian SAM assets are going to be forced to reposition as their air forces continue to probe NATO's eastern states and perhaps a plane or two gets shot down. I wonder how that might affect the actual war going on.

I wonder how stuff from three decades ago is relevant.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back