Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
And an 'upgrade' in this context might mean that the engines actually start....
He did a long time ago. He chose dollar green.Pick a side Elon!!
Stalin's home town. He'd be pleased I'm sure, lol.Way to go, Putin. NATO's man of the year.
The better the tanks the fewer they seem to be. From 420 Challenger 1s, to 227 Challenger 2s to 138 Challenger 3s. By the time we get to Challenger 5 they'll be just a dozen tanks.I had to read this twice to make sure that I wasn't having a fantasy. The words Within Budget and Ahead of Schedule are not seen in the UK
British Army's Challenger 3 Tank Passes Critical Defense Review
Another significant milestone has been achieved by the Challenger 3 Delivery Team within budget and ahead of schedule – we are moving closer to delivering...www.defense-aerospace.com
The better the tanks the fewer they seem to be. From 420 Challenger 1s, to 227 Challenger 2s to 138 Challenger 3s. By the time we get to Challenger 5 they'll be just a dozen tanks.
Did anyone else see the video of the Russian soldier who was poking a suicide drone stuck in a tree?
Probably a typo.I had to read this twice to make sure that I wasn't having a fantasy. The words Within Budget and Ahead of Schedule are not seen in the UK
British Army's Challenger 3 Tank Passes Critical Defense Review
Another significant milestone has been achieved by the Challenger 3 Delivery Team within budget and ahead of schedule – we are moving closer to delivering...www.defense-aerospace.com
More on same:Rheinmetall wants to deliver KF51 Panther main battle tanks to Ukraine
google_ad_client = "pub-4068738923530102"; /* 468x15 data sheet menu top dark green */ google_ad_slot = "3500417247"; google_ad_width = 468; gowww.armyrecognition.com
We are already on 18 leopard-2 tanks, so that sounds about right.The better the tanks the fewer they seem to be. From 420 Challenger 1s, to 227 Challenger 2s to 138 Challenger 3s. By the time we get to Challenger 5 they'll be just a dozen tanks.
Wouldn't 100+ Leopard Is be better than 10 AMX 10s? It seems to me that however useful the AMX 10 is, the Leo I would be better.
Putin condemns old friend to the shadows, suggesting time is up for Wagner mercenaries
"Putin's chef" is known for cooking his way into the Russian president's inner circle, but a very public snub has experts suspecting the relationship may have come undone.www.abc.net.au
The AMX10 I believe to be a blind alley. Its gun isn't as good as the 105 in the Leopard 1, its armour is close to negligible but to be honest the Leopard 1 isn't much to shout about. It is wheeled which means that it will not be as agile in rough terrain. It might have more modern sensors but that will depend on which version of the Leopard 1 you are talking about. Logistically it will be a nightmare.
As a recce vehicle it is just too big, you will see it for miles
I erased the second sentence before posting which went something like "I'm not talking an MBT comparison".Not the same use.
The AMX10 RC is a recon in force vehicle and has never been thought as a battle tank except by inept journalists. As long as I know, a tank does not run on tires...