MiTasol
1st Lieutenant
A couple of things to consider re the 'slow' rate at which the US/NATO is providing complex systems like the tanks and aircraft.
To train the tank crew in the basics of daily maintenance, operations of the weapons system, safe/effective driving of the tank, loading the gun, laying and firing the gun, command of the tank, using terrain to hide, etc, is considered to require a minimum of 3 months. This is just the time to provide the required technical and hands-on knowledge. NOTE that this is normally done after basic training.
To turn the crew into a combat capable crew and integrated with other tank crews to form a combat capable unit, is considered to require a minimum of 9 months - working with one another and with other crews/units..
To train the rear area units in effective maintenance and repair of the M1 Abrams is considered to require a minimum of 6 months. The US can afford to treat the M1 like a one-shot use item - ie if it breaks down you leave it/destroy or disable it if necessary, otherwise recover it when convenient and send it to the rear for repair when convenient. Send in a new tank (including a new crew if necessary). The Ukraine cannot afford to do this - either in terms of numbers of tanks, or in terms of readily accessible/safe repair capability.
None of the above is a comment on the abilities of the Ukrainians - it is simply reality. The UAF will have to select/pull personnel from their cadre/regular/new recruit numbers and send them elsewhere for training. The personnel selected/pulled will (obviously) not be available for duties in Ukraine. How many veteran tankers can they afford to pull from the from line units? Maybe send personnel being rotated to R&R to training instead?
Note that the same considerations re personnel apply to fighter pilot training. It takes at least a year to train a new pilot to be semi-effective in an aircraft like the F-16. If they pull a large enough number of already skilled/veteran pilots to send for training and work-up of 1 or 2 F-16 squadrons (example only) - what will that leave them in terms of an effective Air Force if (when) the brown stuff hits the fan in Ukraine when they are absent?
The same considerations re maintenance also apply to any US/NATO aircraft.
And there are the logistics chain requirements.
Just saying.
Re paragraph 3.
The Ukrainians already have lots of practical experience in these areas and can definitely teach the "experts" a lot on how it all works in modern reality. In other words they can start training today and go into battle three months from now.
Given their willingness to learn and incentives to protect their homeland you can make that two months tops as they will do "homework" for far longer than any US or UK or EU trainee so that they can get home to their loved ones and to kill orcs.
And the same incentives apply to rear echelon units - the only thing that will be a problem is the availability of spare parts. Given their experience in scavenging parts from dead Russian tanks it would not take them long to scavenge Leopard or Challenger parts if they did not have them "in stock". Some of that scavenging could also be from other countries.
PS we need an acronym for ORCS
How about Obscenity* Russian Conscript Scatterbrains
* = choose your own
Last edited: