Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
.. wait till China starts arguing for Russia to surrender previous Chinese lands ...China is certainly arguing that in order to retain its own claim upon Taiwan.
Except that the United Kingdom recognised the PRC as the government of China in 1950.Technically speaking, Hong Kong should have been turned over to Taiwan, not Communist China, sunce the 99 year lease was between Britain and the Qing Dynasty.
Nationalist China (Taiwan) was the successor to the Imperial Chinese government.
Speaking of drunk drivers:Yeah, a drunk driver was not the first thing that people thought of when the truck disappeared. They were really worried that some foreign power might have hijacked it.
Indeed:Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said his country's main task is recapturing territory occupied by Russia. Meanwhile, Latvia has said it will give all its Stinger missiles to Ukraine. DW has the latest.
That does not diminish the fact that the Republic of China was the official government that succeeded Imperial China AND was the government that administered China during and shortly after WWII.Except that the United Kingdom recognised the PRC as the government of China in 1950.
Seeing as how the communist Chinese government never actually ever governed Formosa/Taiwan, I think Xi's claims might not be valid.
At the close of WWII, China was at the time, controlled (by and large) by the Republic of China under Chaing Kai-Shek.Seeing as how the communist Chinese government never actually ever governed Formosa/Taiwan, I think Xi's claims might not be valid.
Ah you still think in the realms of valid to do with anything of the global claims of some countries.Seeing as how the communist Chinese government never actually ever governed Formosa/Taiwan, I think Xi's claims might not be valid.