"All of Vlad's forces and all of Vlad's men, are out to put Humpty together again." (253 Viewers)

So, my guess is that with these longer pylons we'll soon see MiG-29s with Storm Shadow.
I think you will find that Storm Shadow is way too big for the wing pylon station on a MiG-29. I tend more towards western A2A missiles as speculated in the article. AIM120s would be a nice fit.
 
It would be going faster if we got them F-16s faster.
 
The Russians struck military targets?
In Russia's mind, anything they aim at is "military".
Hospitals, schools, farm equipment, portable outhouse, an elderly couple driving down a highway - these are all serious threats to Mother Russia and must be neutralized.
 
a strangely written and pictured article. Talks about russians hit military and infrastructure targets (yeah ......) and destroyed several ammo depots (for sure .....) although the image shows a russian depot destroyed by the Ukrainians
 
a strangely written and pictured article. Talks about russians hit military and infrastructure targets (yeah ......) and destroyed several ammo depots (for sure .....) although the image shows a russian depot destroyed by the Ukrainians
I find those articles disturbing. I just hope they are as factual as other Russian claims.
 
Would NATO radar guided air to air missiles be compatible with the MiG-29's radar?
If they are being ordered now, there will be a delivery time which be at some time in the future. Maybe, if we are very lucky it will be in line with the training time for the F16 pilots and ground crew?
 
It would be going faster if we got them F-16s faster.
IDK. There's a reason NATO is rushing to replace its fourth generation fighters with stealthy F-35s - I assume a big reason is the Russian S-400. Is the F-16 any more survivable against Russian SAMs or for that matter their Su-35s? Would four dozen F-16s be significantly better than four dozen additional MiG-29s?
 
IDK. There's a reason NATO is rushing to replace its fourth generation fighters with stealthy F-35s - I assume a big reason is the Russian S-400. Is the F-16 any more survivable against Russian SAMs or for that matter their Su-35s? Would four dozen F-16s be significantly better than four dozen additional MiG-29s?
Its a personal view but it would clearly depend on how they are equipped. The best example I can give is the Indian Airforce which has both Su30I and Rafale. In exercises the Rafale is all over the Su30 despite them being modernised aircraft with some French and Israeli equipment. The radar on the Rafale can easily overcome the defensive systems on the Su30 whereas the Su30 finds it difficult to penetrate the Rafale defensive equipment.

If the F16 radar is approaching the level of the Rafale, then the difference will be palpable.

The ECM will also be critical. The backbone to the Russian AA equipment seems to be the S300 and S400 systems. If the ECM can deal with the threat of these systems then that could be a game changer in the control of the air.
 
IDK. There's a reason NATO is rushing to replace its fourth generation fighters with stealthy F-35s - I assume a big reason is the Russian S-400. Is the F-16 any more survivable against Russian SAMs or for that matter their Su-35s? Would four dozen F-16s be significantly better than four dozen additional MiG-29s?

The MiGs would be better if properly maintained. No air or ground crew training needed so in to service when needed instead of in at least six months later.

They could be in service days after delivery - new paint, new cockpit decals, maybe some instruments, strap them on and go
 
IDK. There's a reason NATO is rushing to replace its fourth generation fighters with stealthy F-35s - I assume a big reason is the Russian S-400. Is the F-16 any more survivable against Russian SAMs or for that matter their Su-35s? Would four dozen F-16s be significantly better than four dozen additional MiG-29s?
The F-16s would do what the Su-35s and MiG-31s do and probably more. Stand-off launch platforms. The Viper is equipped to launch a whole lot of good stuff. More than the MiG-29 can. I'm sure it will be able to take advantage of other NATO tech. The Viper can certainly put the AGM-88 to better use. The F-16 has air to air missiles that outrange those that the MiG can operate. The VVS will have to pull back deeper behind their lines. That means no more "bomb tosses" by the VVS into Ukrainian assault formations. It also means that air launched munitions launched against civilian, infrastructure and logistical targets will be launched at longer range. Some now possibly out of range. The longer those cruise missiles are in the air, the more time to track and target them. If the VVS want to contest the airspace, fine. I'm guessing they won't. Which side would have the better trained pilots? I'll bet every last cent you have that it's Ukraine.
 
Last edited:

and


The second is long overdue so a great move
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back