yes your rolls would starving for power at that height but us with the pratt we'd be fine and another can you fly upsided down no you cant you will starve the engine
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
yes your rolls would starving for power at that height but us with the pratt we'd be fine and another can you fly upsided down no you cant you will starve the engineAt 35,000ft?
I thought the Pratt was optimised for a much lower altitude.yes your rolls would starving for power at that height but us with the pratt we'd be fine and another can you fly upsided down no you cant you will starve the engine
its a pratt to it attuide doesnt matter and hows it feel to be scared of flying upside downI thought the Pratt was optimised for a much lower altitude.
Were they considered for the Apollo programme?its a pratt to it attuide doesnt matter and hows it feel to be scared of flying upside down
what does that have to do with anythingWere they considered for the Apollo programme?
This is just trolling Spitfire Mk 21 Performance Testingbetter than a spit
no a troll compare those numb ers to the bearcat youll seeThis is just trolling Spitfire Mk 21 Performance Testing
I just did, the Bearcat is the F8 not the pretty blue line.no a troll compare those numb ers to the bearcat youll see
I posted "the numbers" the F4U-4 and 5 and the P-51H all have two stage engines and outperform the Bearcat especially at altitude, the Spitfire 21 has a two stage griffon so why do you expect a different result?show me the numbers ill still think if we would have had to fight the spit we could have took it
In a sort of bluey Bearcatty sort of a way?
its a pratt to it attuide doesnt matter and hows it feel to be scared of flying upside down
maybe but its still funnyPretty sure that issue got ironed out much earlier in the war.
What is? Or is this more trolling?maybe but its still funny