Best Fighter III

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, the Italian 5 Series are NOT included, I never said they were and made it clear that they werent twice, why is everyone ssuming they are? :mad: :lol:
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
So lets see basically we are choosing from the P-51, P-47, P-38, Spitfire, Tempest, Bf-109, Fw-190, and Ta-152, right?

Is this limited to tht ETO? If not the F4U-4 should be included. Also shouldn't the Fw-190 and Ta-152 be considered as one aircraft type or are the P-47M/N and P-51H models left out?

My choice would be the P-38.

wmaxt
 
No it is not limited and I am sorry I forgot those aircraft.

No I dont think the Ta-152 and the Fw-190 should not be grouped into one, they were an evolution but different planes.

In my listing there I was just listing the basic aircraft and then the different varients can be discusses for example I put P-51 but that can include whatever varients a particular person wishes. They can say the P-51B was the best of the war if they like.
 
The main advantage the P-38 has is the fact it has twin engines. I was reading a pilot account earlier of someone who flew P-38's in the MTO. He got shot at by Fw-190's and an engine got taken out. He managed to make it back to Sicily on the one engine at full power. He reckoned he would have died if he was in a Mustang or similar...Ill try and find it again.
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
No it is not limited and I am sorry I forgot those aircraft.

No I dont think the Ta-152 and the Fw-190 should not be grouped into one, they were an evolution but different planes.

In my listing there I was just listing the basic aircraft and then the different varients can be discusses for example I put P-51 but that can include whatever varients a particular person wishes. They can say the P-51B was the best of the war if they like.

I ask because the P-47M/N and P-51H are just as different/same as the Fw-190/Ta-152. I think of them in the same light because the reason the desigination changed was to recognize Tank not because the aircraft was of a signifigantly different design.

wmaxt
 
cheddar cheese said:
The main advantage the P-38 has is the fact it has twin engines. I was reading a pilot account earlier of someone who flew P-38's in the MTO. He got shot at by Fw-190's and an engine got taken out. He managed to make it back to Sicily on the one engine at full power. He reckoned he would have died if he was in a Mustang or similar...Ill try and find it again.

There are many such accounts. I found an interesting set of numbers the other day. of the 1,758 P-38s written off in the ETO only 451 failed to return to base. of the 2,520 P-51s written off, 2,201 failed to return home. Adjusted for percentage of sorties for every P-38 lost 3.8 P-51s were lost.
When compared to the P-47 the P-38/P-47 loss rates are almost the same.

wmaxt
 
Also once an aircraft is twisted or out of true you only fly it again in extream circumstanses. Amoung the numbers written off are training accidents, collisions and any aircraft lost on the ground.

The P-47 has a better total writeoff rate, it seams that 3,077 were written off (423,000 sorties) with 1,043 not returning to base. One note has to be mentioned here P-47s flew the Britten to German border escort leg twice a day on bomber missions. These missions were not normaly heavily contested, greatly reducing both opportunities and danger while doubling sortie count.

wmaxt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back