Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
No more than the Royal or Republic planes from what I've seen...Nazi and Soviet plans seem to always be mystically better on this board of late.
Weren't Luftwaffe techs working on manipulating gravity?
The Peter Three Nine seems less affected by gravity, metric or imperial.
The things one learns here.
That's just a certain artist/corporals impression of his own bell endView attachment 641294
Perhaps this will refresh your memory.
F-51 manual indicate that it can operate at 90hg based on HP value, but the speed is pretty slow though1650-9 was experiencing major issues in producing more that 75" MP until late 1946. The SAC tables were assembled from both NAA 1947 and Eglin testing in 1948.
I mean it is slow compared to this:467-470mph is slow?????
I mean it is slow compared to this:
View attachment 647332
F-51H manual chart show it to be roughly similar to F4U-5
I did noticed that, however the result still very different after conversionMiG-31bm,
Please note that one chart is in Knots and the other is in MPH.
Biff
What are the different between P-51H and F-51H?You do realize that the speed difference is about what might be expected between two different production examples?
Production planes were accepted if they were within a certain percentage of contract speed.
The difference at 21,000ft is well within expected (or accepted) instrument error.
used aircraft were almost always slower than factory fresh. Mustangs were especially subject to this as the factory fit and finish was better than many other aircraft.
I believe that it takes less paint to paint the letter "F" than the letter "P", hence the plane should be lighter.What are the different between P-51H and F-51H?