Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
When Adler asked if u wanted ur vote changed from Gabreski to Urbanowicz, u said yes, which means u voted for him.... Nationistic pride is great and all, but be realistic... Voting for something simply for a nations pride is dumb and uneducated, to say the least.... If u dont know enough about the subject, why fu*kin vote???marshall said:I haven't said that Urbanowicz was a better pilot than great German aces,
Oh really dumb-ass??? I guess that since my Grandfather was an Ace, and I grew up in the Black Sheep Community with other Aces, including Boyington, I guess I am clueless... Or how about the conversations Ive had with Galland or Yeager or Gabreski or Vejtasa or etc etc... I guess I have no idea on the subject.... U had best keep ur fu*kin moth shut moron or I will break it off in ur ass.... Dont piss of a Moderator, ever heard of that???also I don't think that you don't have any idea what are you talking about,
Then why should ur opinion in this thread have any bearing??? U are un-educated in this topic, so maybe u should shut ur yap and read what others who DO have the experience on the subject are saying....I said that I'm not able to tell who was the best.
Then u think wrong.... 9 outta 10 times, the more experienced pilot will take it to the greenie, in a very bad way... Ask the Russian VVS about that, would u.... And always is a strong word however, since there are a few instances where a rookie took out an accomplished Experten, but they are VERY very limited....but does in a 1 on 1 dogfight always wins the guy with more kills under his belt? I don't think so.
Oh really dumb-ass??? I guess that since my Grandfather was an Ace, and I grew up in the Black Sheep Community with other Aces, including Boyington, I guess I am clueless... Or how about the conversations Ive had with Galland or Yeager or Gabreski or Vejtasa or etc etc... I guess I have no idea on the subject.... U had best keep ur fu*kin moth shut moron or I will break it off in ur ass.... Dont piss of a Moderator, ever heard of that???
In any case, I have a question for everyone here who voted for Baer over Marseille. Why do you think he was the best?
In any case, I have a question for everyone here who voted for Baer over Marseille. Why do you think he was the best?
Hartmann shot down his first Soviet victim on 5 November 1942, an Il-2 from 7 GShAP (7th Guards Ground Attack Aviation Regiment)..... Marseille, shot down his last 156-158 on the 26th of September 1942...
One just getting started and one KIA. I wonder what kinda score Marseille would have racked up if he'd been posted on the eastern front later....
Well, who survived the war and who - not?This is a really interesting question. If Marseille had survived to fight on the Eastern Front, and if he'd been active for the whole war, I'm guessing he would have ended up with 500+ kills in total.
Who knows, maybe it would have been even more than that. Hartmann knew enough to cut and run when the odds were too heavily against him.
Marseille's idea of a good time was to do the exact opposite. He was outrageously aggressive, and that would have served him well on the Eastern front.
why not 10000?There would have been lots of targets consisting of poorly-trained pilots in inferior aircraft. He might even have ended up with 1000+ kills. Who knows.
He might even have ended up with 1000+ kills. Who knows.
Well, who survived the war and who - not?
why not 10000?I believe with his style of flying he wouldn't last much longer on the eastern front as well. The poorly-trained pilots were not that poor at all since late 1943 and aircraft quality was rather equal, so with his bad*ss flying he wouldn't have much greater chances to survive and to achieve victories like in Africa.
BTW, there were other pilots on the Eastern Front who had as good shooting skills as Marseille. Rudorffer is just to mention.
If economic shooting is a skill at the top of the heap would be Beurling several times he said a that he hit the aircraft with so many rounds in through the cockpit and when his ammo and the wreck were examined it was confirmed. 12 rounds to drop a 109 and 3 cannon rounds in a Macchi with the same result . But aside from shooting eyesight would be the best weapon as the first to see his opponent has the advantage.
look who I voted for and he can be compared to great pilots but in my mind Marseille was better. I'll vote for him as top allied pilot definately the top shotHey, I want old Buzz to win the greatest ace award as much as any Canadian, but we've got to be honest here. He was a great pilot, but we can't compare him with the top Germans.
I don't know. If Marseille was so reckless he might have been killed before reaching it.
His most "classic" combat, by some analysts, was on June 6, 1942 at noon. While in a bomber escort mission, he saw a formation of 16 P-40 Tomahawk fighter and ground attack aircraft, but initially remained with his formation, escorting the German bombers. After ten minutes, he left his formation with the escorted bombers and flew alone to attack the 16 Tomahawks, but his faithful wingman followed him. Marseille climbed above a tight formation of four, then dived at them. From a range of just 200ft he selected his first victim and turned at him. From a very short range of just 150ft he fired and shot it down. He then pulled up, turned, and dived at his 2nd victim, shooting it down from a range of 150ft. The others began to dive, but Marseille dived at them, turned at his 3rd victim and shot it down at altitude of about 3500ft (1km). He passed thru the smoke from his 3rd victim and leveled at low altitude, and then climbed again. He then dived again, at his 4th victim. He fired from just 100ft, but his guns didn't fire, so he fired his machine guns from very short range and passed thru the debris from his 4th victim. At the moment he hit his 4th victim, his 3rd victim hit the ground after falling 3500ft, approximately 15 seconds between victories, an indication of Marseille's speed. The remaining Tomahawks were now all at very low altitude. He leveled at them and quickly closed distance. He found himself beside one of the Tomahawks, he turned at him and fired, hitting his 5th victim in the engine and the cockpit. He climbed again, watched the remaining Tomahawks, selected a target, dived, levelled, and fired, and passed just above his 6th victim. He then climbed to his wingman which observed the battle from 7500ft above, and then, short of fuel and ammunition, flew back to base.
In 11 minutes of combat, fighting practically alone against a large enemy formation, he shot down six victims, five of them in the first six minutes. He was the only attacker in the battle, and not a single round was fired at him. The surviving Tomahawk pilots said in their debriefing that they were attacked "by a numerically superior German formation which made one formation attack at them, shot down six of their friends, and disengaged". In a post-war analysis of this dogfight these pilots testified the same.
look who I voted for and he can be compared to great pilots but in my mind Marseille was better. I'll vote for him as top allied pilot definately the top shot