DBII's dull photo gallery

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

A couple of bombers.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221215_085243~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_085243~2.jpg
    479.8 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_20221215_085410~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_085410~2.jpg
    513.8 KB · Views: 35
Misc birds
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221215_090712~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_090712~2.jpg
    514.1 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG_20221215_085838~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_085838~2.jpg
    403.4 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_20221215_090029~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_090029~2.jpg
    420.2 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_20221215_085958~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_085958~2.jpg
    519.7 KB · Views: 31
The last great gathering of B17s. If I remember correctly, there were 8 fortresses.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221215_092233~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_092233~2.jpg
    399.5 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_20221215_092134~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_092134~2.jpg
    374 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_20221215_090306~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_090306~2.jpg
    429.5 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_20221215_090357~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_090357~2.jpg
    528.3 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_20221215_091902~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_091902~2.jpg
    459.4 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_20221215_091823~2.jpg
    IMG_20221215_091823~2.jpg
    383.3 KB · Views: 33
The clarity / sharpness problem you mention is probably due to the scanner, particularly if scanned from transparencies.
If these were in slide mounts, card or plastic, or glass mounts, the scanner should have an adjustment to allow for the difference in "thickness".
 
The clarity / sharpness problem you mention is probably due to the scanner, particularly if scanned from transparencies.
If these were in slide mounts, card or plastic, or glass mounts, the scanner should have an adjustment to allow for the difference in "thickness".
My guess is operator error. They were photos, I will figure it out.
 
Ah, if colour prints, then it' s most likely an exposure problem, or perhaps not in full contact with the scanner bed.
( put a weight, such as book, on the closed scanner lid.)
The majority of flat-bed scanners do not have an exposure control as such. I have two scanners, a separate Cannon scanner, which gives great results, and a Cannon printer/scanner, which always tends to be overexposed when scanning colour prints.
Sharpness, saturation and contrast can, however, be adjusted quite easily using Irfanview.
 
Ah, if colour prints, then it' s most likely an exposure problem, or perhaps not in full contact with the scanner bed.
( put a weight, such as book, on the closed scanner lid.)
The majority of flat-bed scanners do not have an exposure control as such. I have two scanners, a separate Cannon scanner, which gives great results, and a Cannon printer/scanner, which always tends to be overexposed when scanning colour prints.
Sharpness, saturation and contrast can, however, be adjusted quite easily using Irfanview.
[/QUO

Thanks.
 
Everything in the AvPix unlimited thread was scanned with my crappy HP printer scanner, clean up with Photoshop. No image manipulation other than image size to fit forum needs.
 
I was going through emails from 2009 and found these birds.
 

Attachments

  • 128_128.JPG
    128_128.JPG
    38.9 KB · Views: 14
  • 129_129.JPG
    129_129.JPG
    35.7 KB · Views: 14
  • 024_24.JPG
    024_24.JPG
    44.5 KB · Views: 16
  • 010_10.JPG
    010_10.JPG
    37.4 KB · Views: 15
  • 058_58.JPG
    058_58.JPG
    38.2 KB · Views: 14
  • 011_11.JPG
    011_11.JPG
    38.5 KB · Views: 15
  • 059_59.JPG
    059_59.JPG
    38.6 KB · Views: 15
Now something a little more modern.
 

Attachments

  • 001_1.JPG
    001_1.JPG
    44.3 KB · Views: 16
  • 121_121.JPG
    121_121.JPG
    44.8 KB · Views: 14
  • 122_122.JPG
    122_122.JPG
    31.4 KB · Views: 15
  • 123_123.JPG
    123_123.JPG
    24.8 KB · Views: 15
  • 112_112.JPG
    112_112.JPG
    23.2 KB · Views: 16
  • 101_101.JPG
    101_101.JPG
    19.2 KB · Views: 16

Users who are viewing this thread

Back