Airframes
Benevolens Magister
James, I've just been looking at a picture on page 22 of the SAM Guide for Modelelrs - Mosquito. This shows the same aircraft, with a larger group of men, taken on what was obviously a warm, sunny day, as most of the group are in RAF 'shirt sleeve order', with ties. The same young chap is clearly seen, wearing RAF shirt with sleeves rolled up.
The caption states the aircraft is a Mosquito BXVI, which is incorrect, but does not give any info as to the identity of the group of men. They look like they are possibly the regular ground crew, with the young chap perhaps a recent addition?
It is evident that they are all in RAF uniform, including forage caps, in this very clear photo. The angle of the light, and the bright summers day, make it possible to see the diffused interior of the nose of the Mossie through the black paint on the perspex.
In view of this photo, presumably taken at a different time, it seems to point to it being unlikely (but not impossible) that the young chap in question is the relative you mention.
Note: I've only briefly flipped through this book, which is not up to the standard of the others in this series, and I've already noticed at least three photos with captions which are incorrect, not including the above mentioned photo.
The caption states the aircraft is a Mosquito BXVI, which is incorrect, but does not give any info as to the identity of the group of men. They look like they are possibly the regular ground crew, with the young chap perhaps a recent addition?
It is evident that they are all in RAF uniform, including forage caps, in this very clear photo. The angle of the light, and the bright summers day, make it possible to see the diffused interior of the nose of the Mossie through the black paint on the perspex.
In view of this photo, presumably taken at a different time, it seems to point to it being unlikely (but not impossible) that the young chap in question is the relative you mention.
Note: I've only briefly flipped through this book, which is not up to the standard of the others in this series, and I've already noticed at least three photos with captions which are incorrect, not including the above mentioned photo.