Ralph Haus
Tech Sergeant
Impressed, painting by the gallon....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Bikini waxing is somewhere else!I was thinking he was trying to give himself a cheap wax!!!!
Latex Gliddon from Home Depot. They color match. Use a roller!Impressed, painting by the gallon....
The scheme I'm doing doesn't call for 65. I have to different schemes and one calls for 74, 75 & 76 (kit directions) the other (HGW called for 02, 70, 71 and 76. Neither calls for 65. That being said I do believe the 76 should at least in aft come further forward over the wing but by the drawing not much. I can't find photos of either bird myself. Several books on the one ten and nothing found.Looking great. I might have carried the fuselage RLM 65 over the wings but don't have any conclusive pics of your bird to prove it.
I'll look but the HGW calls for 76 sides and underneath as well. The 02 is used in a three color splinter camo with the 71 and 70. I have several Vasco books on the subject so I'll look again. I had started using the HGW diagrams for the paint back in GB 53 but changed to the kit scheme here. Both are from the same group with the hornetYeah, sorry, I meant 76 but am listening to a podcast as I write.
The 02/70/71 scheme refers to the upper colours (02 being mottle colours) and for this the 65 would have been used for the fuselage sides and undersides.
There is a pic of S9+LP in one of Vasco's books but the aircraft is in flight and banking away slightly so the details above the wing aren't seen.
76 with 70 and 71 would have been non-standard but exceptions were always in possible. It would be pretty hard to distinguish between 65 and 76 in a B&W photo though.