Spitfire pr1v
Airman
- 10
- May 28, 2021
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Ive been looking to see what accessories are there https://i.pinimg.com/736x/a7/34/67/a73467b995cdb5fa41dae79148bb670a--air-planes-cutaway.jpgHi Fastmongrel. Thanks for the suggestion but cockpit heating only came in on the PRIVs and later variations as far as I know,
I get what your saying, but I didn't think that the early Mk1 PR aircraft didn't have the additional oil tank. I certainly could be wrong on this but I thought it was the Mk 2 or PR Mk 2 that first had additional fuelSPITFIRE PR III
Spitfire IA with armament removed, extra fuel tank and Camera fitted for photographic reconnaissance. All modified from existing IA machines. A larger oil tank under the nose gave it a less streamlined profile, but extended the range.
From here A description of all the different marks of Supermarine Spitfire and Seafire
I was just trying to be helpful. Elsewhere in the link it talks about oil tanks being installed in the unused gun bays. Changing the use of the Spitfire to long hour missions involved more fuel and more oil, because they consumed a lot of oil, same for the P-51B/C and later variants which needed a bigger oil tank.I get what your saying, but I didn't think that the early Mk1 PR aircraft didn't have the additional oil tank. I certainly could be wrong on this but I thought it was the Mk 2 or PR Mk 2 that first had additional fuel
I posted a cutaway of a Spitfire up the thread, I think the dynamo is in that general area. But I saw an article ages ago about Spitfires and there were all sorts of accessories that needed cooling or at least fresh air that were moved about the air frame.No your right and I am quite probably wrong. I know that a large part of the additional oil was in a tank that was under the nose giving it a different nose. The very first handful didn't have any additional fuel or oil, but I do mean a very small number.
It doesn't alter the question which is valid, what are those vents for as I don't know either. It was wrong of me to divert the thread
Wurger - your photos are great, clearer than mine, showing the intake and vent.
I dont know if they fitted a larger dynamo or that a P/R Spitfire had much more electrical equipment, it may have been a precaution due to the longer length of time in the air.Pbehn - I think maybe an electrical venting might be the answer, with a larger dynamo fitted, for the extra power to supply the cameras and their motors ?