Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Note the chopped props. Gen. Douglas MacArthur's surrender terms prescribed that all Japanese aircraft including unarmed types like transports had to be disabled to prevent retaliatory revenge attacks by rogue pilots.Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate captured beute
View attachment 720108
World War ll American G.I. Sitting In Japanese Zero Airplane Cockpit Photo | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for World War ll American G.I. Sitting In Japanese Zero Airplane Cockpit Photo at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!www.ebay.com
Its not that easy to retract the MLG of aircraft, it is designed to not retract when there is weight on the wheels. First you would have to simulate the aircraft in the air, on modern A/C you would pull the circuit breakers for the ground control relay. Them you have to have hydraulic pressure, on A/C with electric hydraulic pumps that is as simple as turning them on. But as I understand it most single engined A/C of that era only had an engine driven Hyd. pump, or possible a emergency hand pump. (correct me if I am wrong please) I for one would not want to be in the cockpit with the engine running and pull the gear handle up with all the safeties overridden! I would be afraid of where the prop blades would go!The main method of disabling aircraft was removal of the prop and spinner but chopping the prop blades is also seen in a lot of photos. The other popular method was to collapse the main gear on one side of the aircraft (either port or starboard). I'm no engineer or pilot but I think it would be easy enough to sit in the cockpit and ensuring the hydraulics were primed pull the lever for undercarriage retraction. Maybe you could do it on the ground just use a hammer to give the lock mechanism a good belt then run like hell before you get crushed.
View attachment 720633
Not sure if this A/c has had its port undercarriage dropped or is it being jacked up after the event. What do you think?
Moky for JEC
Note the chopped props. Gen. Douglas MacArthur's surrender terms prescribed that all Japanese aircraft including unarmed types like transports had to be disabled to prevent retaliatory revenge attacks by rogue pilots.
,
Needless to say I don't think I heard a single unit or individual pilot tried to perform such actions. Although pilots of the famous N1K2-J Shiden-KAIs of 343 Kokutai commanded by Cdr GENDA Minoru did seek to fight on after the surrender but were overruled by JNAF Headquarters.
The main method of disabling aircraft was removal of the prop and spinner but chopping the prop blades is also seen in a lot of photos. The other popular method was to collapse the main gear on one side of the aircraft (either port or starboard). I'm no engineer or pilot but I think it would be easy enough to sit in the cockpit and ensuring the hydraulics were primed pull the lever for undercarriage retraction. Maybe you could do it on the ground just use a hammer to give the lock mechanism a good belt then run like hell before you get crushed.
View attachment 720633
Not sure if this A/c has had its port undercarriage dropped or is it being jacked up after the event. What do you think?
Moky for JEC
Or a ground inclination.his may suggest that these A/c have had their starboard main gear collapsed thus raising the wing on the port side.
Nanking or Shanghai ring a bell?Photos will be quicker to explain. This was clearly against the Geneva Convention.
Tokyo Air Raid on March 10, 1945. Some other dates may be mixed.
View attachment 714159View attachment 714160View attachment 714161View attachment 714162View attachment 714163View attachment 714164View attachment 714165View attachment 714166View attachment 714167View attachment 714168
Source: Tokyo Air Raids Photo Album (1953)
Will you explain more, Peter?Nanking or Shanghai ring a bell?
Not trying to be argumentativeWill you explain more, Peter?
Japanese learned American viewpoint a lot in the postwar.Not trying to be argumentativeShinpachi but if we're going to start talking possible war crimes, March '45 isn't a starting point for the Pacific War:
I like you too much to start any arguments Shin, let's just agree to disagree, "incidents" in China in the late '30's shall we say were already well known in the U.S. before 7/12/41.Japanese learned American viewpoint a lot in the postwar.
So, I have shown what Americans hesitate to learn at school.
LeMay did not know details of the Nanking Incident until April 1946 when the military tribunal was held in Tokyo.
So, this can't be excuse for his 'war crime' at least.