eBay: Messerschmitt Bf109

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Totally agree. It gives me the creeps too.
 
Yes, We did the retractions on the Bf 109G Black-Six with a hydraulic rig. We could do it with a rig electric motor driven pump with controllable flow for normal test retractions. However, for set-up of the door fit, we used the rig manual lever operated pump for careful work. Apart from adjusting the door fit, the leg position on the up-locks has to be set and both things require careful work.
Like many or most taildraggers, the 109 jacking points are behind the mainwheels and the tail needs holding-down as it lifts with jacking at the jacking points. Getting the tailwheel in the air and then holding it down and getting the mainwheels in the air requires some skill and the correct kit to do it properly. Also, the 109 jacking points on the spar-carry through bottom face are very shallow, circular depressions about 30mm dia and only 5mm deep, so it needs very good tie-downs to do this with the engine hyd pump!
This early Jumo 210 powered 109 looks to be well secured, with fore and aft restraint to ground tie-downs. However, there are photos of this being done in N.Africa with just guys sitting on the tail, jacking beam under the main points and the engine running!
Cheers

Eng
 
Love these little insights. Thanks.
 
Engineman thanks for the info on jacking a Bf 109! The only tail dragger's I ever Jacked and swung the gear on were several Beach 18's. The Bf109 procedure sounds similar to what has to be done with a tricycle geared jet with rear mounted engines such as DC-9's and B-727's. They actually require 3 jacks in the normal position, and a 4th jack under the tail to keep them from tipping back onto their tails during the procedure.

Always nice to learn something on this board!
 
Hi cammerjeff,
Yes, biggest I have done myself was Comet (Nimrod). That was still impressive with the full system rig that had same output as the aircraft, we had to do the usual timed retracts after gear changes etc. Still shook the aircraft but didn't need tying down.
With the 109 we had to do a level flying position fuel gauge calibration by measured filling from empty. That was a bit tricky because the tail was very high and we wanted it on the beam so that wheels were not in the equation. As you lift it that high the CofG goes forward of the wheel contact points and it really wants to tip on its nose. Then, with 700 lb of fuel in the tank, you need to lower the stands at the back and get it all on the ground again. Not straightforward, lots of scope to get it badly wrong! Of course, the German manual does not cover the detail.

Cheers

Eng
 

Hi Snautzer,
An interesting and cold pic of a 109F, it is up on jacks, tied down and supported at the rear lifting tube. Guess it is having gun alignment, with the seat pan out on the wing and the prop positioned clear of the MG 17's line of sight. Fortunately, we didn't have to accurately boresight our guns in the freezing cold!!

Cheers

Eng
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Hi Snautzer,
This is interesting, they do not have the main jacks or lifting beam in under the forward fuselage, but the tail is lifted maybe 2 feet on the tripods at the rear. There looks to be a bomb or similar hanging there on ropes as a weight to stop the aircraft tipping on its nose! Aircraft looks to be an F3/4 and the underwing panel O/B of the undercarriage bay is removed and leaning on the left wheel door.

Eng
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Users who are viewing this thread