Dash119
Senior Airman
First,
GrauGeist
I'm not sure that higher altitudes result in greater fuel efficiency and engine load demand for pistons engines as it does with turbojets and turbofans. Higher altitudes require more boost and there is a cost for that. Additionally, although the air is cooler it is less dense meaning cooling is less efficient. Hence the numbers for the B-36 above.
Second, BiffF15 your descriptions of the divert process on the OV-10 & RC-26 don't really answer the question of fuel efficiency and engine load at altitude. To this layman they just seem to indicate that the fuel efficiency in climb is lousy compared to the fuel efficiency in cruise and descent.
I'm thinking the efficiencies have nothing to do with the propellors, but rather the piston versus the turbine.
Second, BiffF15 your descriptions of the divert process on the OV-10 & RC-26 don't really answer the question of fuel efficiency and engine load at altitude. To this layman they just seem to indicate that the fuel efficiency in climb is lousy compared to the fuel efficiency in cruise and descent.
I'm thinking the efficiencies have nothing to do with the propellors, but rather the piston versus the turbine.