Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I'm sure you have.GRAUGEIST
I have fired a 12 gauge shot gun multiple times off the back of an ATV moving 20 to 30 miles an hour and moving happened? Was that the point you were trying to make?
The mass of gases leaving the barrels should be added to the mass of the projectiles leaving the barrels. In the equation it is the sum of all mass being projected from the aircraft that is relevant. I would contend (but I don't know much about firearms) that this mass of gas is a very small component of the total mass being ejected. Any gases or anything else that remain in the aircraft, or weapon, are not relevant.
Cheers
Steve
For those of you interested in continuing with the analysis, the typical 50-cal round had about 14.5 grams of powder in it. If you add that, you might affect the 3rd or 4th decimal place.
I think we should be looking at kinetic energy here, not momentum.Momentum = m v, and when the mass is 4,309 kg and the velocity is 1,400 m/s, changing the mass to 4,309.045 versus 4,309.060 doesn't do anything to speak of to the result
...when the mass is 4,309 kg and the velocity is 1,400 m/s...
The original poster asked what it was like to shoot a machine gun, or cannon, in a aircraft.
I race cars, and I let other people race my car. For 4 years now there is always a Go-Pro camera inside the car viewing the driver and a lot of the action out front and to the sides.
Before installing those Go-Pro cameras we relied on videos taken of the race.
Viewing those videos , from both views often tell a different story from the driver, even when the driver was me.
I'm come to the conclusion that the more excited, or excitable, a person is, the less reliable his recall is of events.