Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
No choice
Victories/losses
H-75: 230/29
Germans were loosing. Henschell Hs 126 biplane dive bomber
The claims of German technical superiority are also undermined by the kinds aircraft the Germans were loosing. Henschell Hs 126 biplane dive bomber. Interesting is the heavy looses of Hurricane in Fastmongrel's data. Were they also being used for ground attack?
actually Hs 126The claims of German technical superiority are also undermined by the kinds aircraft the Germans were loosing. Henschell Hs 126 biplane dive bomber.
It was only partially maligned. It was miss used. It was a single engine strategic bomber pressed into tactical use without proper training (low level bombing vs medium or high altitude) for the crews or contrary to your expectations, even provided a minimal escort on most of it's missions. In some cases due to poor communications.I get the impression that the Fairy Battle was much maligned. It seems to have been an quite accurate weapon with its crews competently confident of busting bridges with a sting of bombs. The weapon was probably not escorted appropriately. One would expect that each Battle should receive its own Vic.
Most German FLAK seems to have been towed on the versatile German Sd. Ah. 51 two wheel trailer which had a split Y chassis. Apart from carrying 20mm FLAK guns it carried FLAK predictors, ammunition, signals equipment.
I've always taken claims of German technological superiority with a large grain of salt. For one thing, check out the airfoils used on the Bf109. For another, check out the machinery in many of their destroyers.
France lost for numerous reasons, many having less to do with German competence (and the German Army and Luftwaffe were tactically excellent) but with the French Army's incompetence and the absolute hatred some parts of its political leadership had for each other. ("French conservatives condemn French Socialist leader Léon Blum because of his Jewish ancestry and his strongly anti-Nazi orientation. A popular slogan at the time condemns the future French premier: 'Better Hitler than Blum.'" -- Timeline of Jewish Persecution in the Holocaust).
In many cases the supposed technical superiority fell on it's face because they tried to push things an extra step further than what other people were doing. Being first always has risks and the further out in front you try to push the bigger the risk.
The Germans had some of the best integration of forces and communications in the early part of the war. Even a few radios beat motorcycle messengers for example.
In many cases the supposed technical superiority fell on it's face because they tried to push things an extra step further than what other people were doing. Being first always has risks and the further out in front you try to push the bigger the risk.
The Germans had some of the best integration of forces and communications in the early part of the war. Even a few radios beat motorcycle messengers for example.
Not an expert on this but I believe Adolf knew Russia USA UK and France were re arming and was aware that they would soon catch up. Also he had little concept of sustained warfare. Also he had no one to advise him, Goering was unaware of the LW losses sustained in Belgium Holland Norway and France prior to the Battle of Britain, if he didn't know how would Hitler? Also Hitler was a bit nutz in the strategy departmentAll the German forces were aligned for a relatively short tactical campaign and yet Hitler and the Nazi leadership consistently refused to do anything other than escalate even when there was no pressing need for that escalation.
In Europe they could also depend on trains for long distance or heavy movement. Then use horse drawn wagons for short distances. Eastern Europe and Russia had nowhere near the rail density of western Europe. This was one reason for the allies shooting up all the rail transport they could before D-Day.And yet, logistically, the German army was relatively unmechanised, with heavy reliance on horses. The adage that good generals think about tactics whereas the great generals think about logistics seems apposite here. All the German forces were aligned for a relatively short tactical campaign and yet Hitler and the Nazi leadership consistently refused to do anything other than escalate even when there was no pressing need for that escalation.
Easy to forget that trains were the means of transport used by most in Europe before WW2. Pre war cars were owned by rich enthusiasts..In Europe they could also depend on trains for long distance or heavy movement. .
Trains were the means of long distant transport in the US. The interstate highway system hadn't been built.Easy to forget that trains were the means of transport used by most in Europe before WW2. Pre war cars were owned by rich enthusiasts..
In Europe they could also depend on trains for long distance or heavy movement. Then use horse drawn wagons for short distances. Eastern Europe and Russia had nowhere near the rail density of western Europe. This was one reason for the allies shooting up all the rail transport they could before D-Day.
Easy to forget that trains were the means of transport used by most in Europe before WW2. Pre war cars were owned by rich enthusiasts..