GB 57 question

[PlasticHero]

This GB will include aircraft carrying the markings of a capturing country provided that the capture actually occurred. No "What-ifs" will be allowed. This text is from the GB thread, so seems legit. How complex is this paint scheme?

 

[Donivanp]

Would a captured Me 262 fit the bill for the GB?

If it's within the 1945 September time frame it should, but what do I know

 

[SaparotRob]

Way more than I do.

 

[N4521U]

Wrong thread........

 

[Donivanp]

How about "MustangsMustangs". Any year, any mod, singles-n-twins, even "what ifs", from first built to modern Reno Race planes.

I like, I like!!!!!!!

 

[N4521U]

I like, I like!!!!!!!

You caught it before I removed it to 58 and beyond.

 

[Donivanp]

You caught it before I removed it to 58 and beyond.

What can I say, I'm fast like that, you know, when I'm not supposed to be

 

[Crimea_River]

Is an aircraft that was left intact after capitulation really captured? But you know what, it would be great to see a Me262 in the build.

 

[Jock Tamson]

Is an aircraft that was left intact after capitulation really captured? But you know what, it would be great to see a Me262 in the build.

Hi Andy, yes it was captured and flight tested by the RAF before being given to USAAF before the end of hostilities, I think. There's options for both in the kit.

 

[Snautzer01]

Hi Andy, yes it was captured and flight tested by the RAF before being given to USAAF before the end of hostilities, I think. There's options for both in the kit.

Dont forget the French.

 

[Donivanp]

You caught it before I removed it to 58 and beyond.

What can I say, I'm fast like that, you know, when I'm not supposed to be

 

[Jock Tamson]

This GB will include aircraft carrying the markings of a capturing country provided that the capture actually occurred. No "What-ifs" will be allowed. This text is from the GB thread, so seems legit. How complex is this paint scheme?

Here's the scheme from the instructions:

 

[Greg Boeser]

Hmmmm. Something easy. 1:72.
Curtiss Hawk 75 in foreign markings?
Curtiss Hawk 75A-6 "439", Royal Norwegian Air Force. They were based at Kjeller Airbase, Norway, March 1940. Seven of 19 were partially assembled before being captured during the German invasion.

Curtiss Hawk 75A 6 Norwegian

Redirect Notice

 

[Snautzer01]

Hmmmm. Something easy. 1:72.
Curtiss Hawk 75 in foreign markings?
Curtiss Hawk 75A-6 "439", Royal Norwegian Air Force. They were based at Kjeller Airbase, Norway, March 1940. Seven of 19 were partially assembled before being captured during the German invasion.

Curtiss Hawk 75A 6 Norwegian

Redirect Notice

Nr447

Curtiss P-36 Hawk , Curtiss Hawk Model 75

:thumbright:

ww2aircraft.net

 

[le_steph40]

Hmmmm. Something easy. 1:72.
Curtiss Hawk 75 in foreign markings?
Curtiss Hawk 75A-6 "439", Royal Norwegian Air Force. They were based at Kjeller Airbase, Norway, March 1940. Seven of 19 were partially assembled before being captured during the German invasion.

Curtiss Hawk 75A 6 Norwegian

Redirect Notice

Very interesting, this particular aircraft will become later the mount of Kyosti Karhila, a Finnish ace with about 32 victories of which 8 or 9 were claimed with H75 CU(w)-560, former Norvegian "439"...

 

[Greg Boeser]

Nr447

Curtiss P-36 Hawk , Curtiss Hawk Model 75

:thumbright:

ww2aircraft.net

Thanks, @Snautzer01!
That is way clearer than the photo I found. No wing guns. Hardpoints for five bombs on wing. I don't see any stencilling just a/c # and national markings. Logo on prop blades.

 

[Greg Boeser]

Time to hit the LMS to see what they have in stock.

 

[Donivanp]

Time to hit the LMS to see what they have in stock.

LMS?

 

[Greg Boeser]

LMS?

Local Model Shop

 

[Donivanp]

Time to hit the LMS to see what they have in stock.

LMS?

Local Model Shop

Oh, okay good to try first place! Try to keep them in business