Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I would have to say the loss of Force Z because it had the biggest immediate impact. Whilst the losses of Hood and Glorious were big blows, they had relatively little impact on the immediate course of the War. In Hood's case, the Bismarck was a goner regardless, the RN's surface fleet was so dominant in the Atlantic that it was just a matter of time. Glorious was returning from the abandoned Norwegian campaign and had little part to play in the coming Battle of Britain. And the Ceylon Raid did little more than cement the IJN's overall hold of the Western Pacific caused by the loss of Force Z. The loss of Force Z, however, meant the IJN could operate with virtual impunity off Malaysia, ensuring the eventual fall of Singapore.
Force Z was a deterrent which never worked.
Japanese were considered weak and so their threat was vastly underestimated.
Admiral Phillips view on air power was not positive.
Fair enough it was a few bombers then yes it could survive but not wave after wave. And air power had yet to sink a fully operational battleship and PoW was as modern as it gets. So maybe hubris was not misplaced.
Oddly the air power offered was Brewster Buffaloes!
Even if not sunk the 2 ships would have faced IJN surface units such as cruisers and destroyers and 2 Kongos. So even a sea engagement would have been a tough ask.
Maybe a Kongo v PoW is a win for PoW but the destroyers would have fired long lances until empty and that would have not ended well either.
The answer to you last point is I believe in your first point, as they would have been valuable carrier escorts. The POW was modern with (for the time) comprehensive radar and AA weapons. The Repulse would have needed a refit before taking the front line in a similar role but even as she was, she took a lot of damage before the end.Since Force Z's purpose is to dissuade Japan from attacking, once war comes the correct thing to do would be to withdraw them, or offer them as carrier escorts to the Americans.
However, suppose they'd survived, what offensive role could they have played in the Far East?
A couple questions regarding HMS Indomitable.
First of all, if she was off Jamaica in November, could she have made it in time to join Force Z?
Also, since she was on her first tour, how experienced was her crew, both ship-board and pilot-wise.
And lastly; it is my understanding that during November/December, she had a compliment of 12 Martlets, 22 Sea Hurricanes and 16 Albacores. How well would those have stacked up against the land-based IJN fighters and bombers?
All the capital ships sunk by aircraft before Force Z were stationary in harbour, The sinking of Force Z was the first time any capital ship was sunk solely by air power while at sea.But sending PoW and Repulse was always going to end badly. The war had left battleships behind and Pearl Harbour, Taranto, the Swordfish attack on Bismarck and even the Skua bombing and sinking the Koningsberg showed the Battleship as vulnerable.
When an airplane considered as mundane as the Skua is sinking major warships then Force Z is just folly.
OK, suppose Phillips decided not to sortie without air-cover, and the Buffalos of 435Sq RAAF and 488Sq RNZAF have an early Christmas amongst the unescorted Japanese level- and torpedo-bombers. Remember, the Japanese bombers were all low on fuel when the made their attacks, attacked in several small waves, and none above 11,500ft, so even the Buffalos would have been able to shoot them down or drive them off. Then Force Z scarpers back to Singapore intact.…...However, suppose they'd survived, what offensive role could they have played in the Far East?
Obviously I agree, but Repulse against a Kongo is close, with advantage to Repulse as it did have radar which depending on the weather, could be a good advantage. What is clear is that two x Kongo vs POW and Repulse is a mismatch.Repulse v Yamato? Yikes.
I would have to disagree, the loss of Force Z does not allow the IJN to "operate with virtual impunity off Malaysia" as they could do that already. Conversly, the survival of Force Z (or even a successful interception of a Japanese convoy ) doesn't save Malaya, or even have much impact on Japanese naval operations.
The loss of Glorious has a far bigger strategic impact, with lasting effects for years.
Basket's points are correct.
Since Force Z's purpose is to dissuade Japan from attacking, once war comes the correct thing to do would be to withdraw them, or offer them as carrier escorts to the Americans.
However, suppose they'd survived, what offensive role could they have played in the Far East?
The IJN long range bomber could perform search & strike unopposed, but trying to coordinate an escorted strike hundreds of miles from base is going to be tricky.
IJA air cooperation with the IJN was crap, so combined operations are unlikely.
Was reading somewhere recently about this (PoW & Repulse)....
Two things I remember about it.
1] The RAF failed to provide air cover (?)
2] No tracer ammunition for the AA guns on one or both ships which would have helped with target correction (?)
[Unverified source, as I can't remember where I read about it].
Your #1 isn't accurate. The RAF leadership in Singapore informed Admiral Phillips that sustained fighter protection over northern Malaya was impossible because the northern airfields had been, or were being, evacuated. However, a squadron of Buffalos was placed on dedicated alert to respond if called for by Force Z. Unfortunately, it seems that Admiral Phillips just heard "no RAF fighter cover" and so he didn't even call for fighter support when the first Japanese aircraft was sighted as Force Z retired back to Singapore. By the time the call was made, it was too late and the fate of Repulse and PoW was sealed despite the engagement taking place well within the range of the fighters sitting at Singapore.
The RAF did not fail to provide air cover. The RN failed to ask for the cover that was available.