Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
A lot of people died in the Middle East campaign in ww1. And today in Syria and Iraq. So stopping Goeben would have prevented All that. So not just a disaster for the Royal Navy but for the world.
By the time of the Doolittle Raid (1942)There were no battleship escort with the Doolittle Raid as there was no USN battle ship at the time fast enough.
Not saying that PoW and Repulse were God tier weapons but they did offer capabilities that then current USN didn't have.
Nagato was too slow so it's Kongos and Yamato. Not saying Repulse could have taken on Yamato but a Kongo is fair enough plus of course carrier escort means carrier dive bombers. So it's not all 1v1.
The fall of the Ottoman Empire was a result of ww1 and so the creation of the modern middle East. How long the Ottoman Empire would have survived is another matter without ww1 is a great dunno.
*SNIP*
The Royal Navy does not run away.
Paging Admiral Troubridge...
Although in all fairness, his was one hell of a tough decision.
That depends on whether Goeben was the only reason for the Ottoman Empire joining the war. Or a minor factor.
If Goeben was the reason Ottomans joined in ww1 then it's escape can be classed as a disaster as it meant all them deaths could have been avoided. The break up of the Ottoman Empire created modern states like Syria and Iraq so again cause and effect.
I am not blaming RN for Syria today but the domino was pushed in 1914 and here we are today.
On the IJN side, any battleship with radar would be an asset to a carrier fleet that had none. Otherwise, yes, leave the battleships at home.What good would a Battleship have been at Midway or Coral Sea?