Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I suspect tongue firmly in cheek. That said, Arnold was well aware during the Spanish Civil War, Blitzkrieg and then Battle of Britain - that the bomber frequently did not get through. The primary issues for both the Brits and US were a.) a single engine fighter with the fuel weight fraction necessary to extend to target range could not compete with the interceptors of the day, and b.) that multi engine aircraft with the fuel fraction potential, would be equally handicapped, but the only technologically feasible (at that time) escort solution. He personally changed the Kilner-Lindbergh and Emmons Report recommendations of low priority for long range (1500 miles) fighter to first, was his own vision that a 'back up' contingency that B-17 high speed and altitude would not be enough to support the Army Air Force War Plans Directive in the future."Don't need THAT much range; the bombers will always get through. What we need is a high altitude air superiority fighter/interceptor"
11 meters = 36 feet which is why the English always lose a penalty shoot out.
Hmm...Well, I guess my math is not as great as yours.
P-39D clean: 5,400 pounds
P-38F clean: 12,250 pounds.
That looks to be almost 7 tons difference. (Actually 6,850 lbs difference)
P-39D loaded: 7,500 pounds.
P-38F loaded: 15,900 pounds.
There appears to be about 8 tons difference. (Actually 8,400 lbs difference)
But I suppose counting on fingers can be confusing...
At that moment in time Packard was well on its way to production tooling for the 1650-3, but RAF/and the BAM were already discussing possible license production of NA-91 w/Merlin 65 in Britain.
It was a never ending discussion in German bars. Whether a penalty is 11 meters or 12 yards and why the English always miss lol. It is obviously 12 yards, the goal is 8 yards by 8 feet, and the boxes are 6 yards and 18 yards with a 10 yard radius on the penalty spot and centre circle. Only the penalty spot a metric measurement by pure chance.I thought that was because they were playing ze Germans...
Universal metric acceptance can't come soon enough14 pounds = 1 stone
8 stones = 1 hundredweight
20 hundred weight = 1 ton
20 x 8 x 14 = 2,240 lbs
Couldn't be any easier!
I know the imperial system but never actually used it from the age of about 8. However I worked in the oil gas industry which is still governed by API specifications so even within Europe tally lists are produced in metric and imperial for weight and length. There may be some issues if they decide to change the gauge on railways though.Universal metric acceptance can't come soon enough
If you buy a ton of anything, one tenth is too heavy for anyone to lift, the practical limit is 1/20th of a ton which is 1 hundredweight. Most imperial measures evolved because of practical use, which is pragmatic but becomes difficult to impossible for calculations.I have for years told people, if we had been born with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, the world would use the imperial system. I then point out twice as many numbers are evenly divisible into 12 as 10.
Things like that. An acre was based on how much an average horse could plough in a day, so if you know an acreage you know how many horses/days you need to plough it. A hand is used to measure horses because a foot is too big, one hand is four inches or 1/3 of a foot. It is the same in foot measurements using barleycorns which are 1/3 of an inch.Do you mean measuring horses by how many hands high?
Stay away from shellfish......or strawberries, I can't remember whichAll of the above is well and good, but what if there is an 'R' in the month?
Obviously Shellfish, strawberries has two "R"s in it. Please pay attention it is perfectly simple.Stay away from shellfish......or strawberries, I can't remember which
Same in UK, an acre is a chain (22 yards) x a furlong 220yards (furrow length). A horse or pair of oxen need a rest after ploughing a furrow. In a game of Cricket the wickets are 1 chain apart.In the US, for a great many years land was measured with a chain of exact length which laid on the ground, but since the use of transits and optical measuring, the property lines of old established land are being moved. Differing measuring systems have always caused difficulty. Rifles of US and UK manufacture have the rear sites marked in yards, while European rifles were in meters, and Russian rifles were in Arshins.