Grumman F4F Wildcat

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Martlet Western Desert Navy RNFS code ??725

1665049246639.png


1665049257742.png


 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
1942 HMS Formidable AM974

1667993752054.png


1667993744437.png



 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Definitely taken during the war, probably in September 1940 when the first were delivered from the USA. Note the tricolor rudder, a hat tip to the original French order for the aircraft, which was taken over by a hasty request from the Royal Navy while they were still on the production line. The colour scheme was interesting and has been subject to much post-war comment. This surviving Martlet I is still in its delivery scheme - yup, this is the colour scheme the first Martlets arrived from Grumman in.

View attachment 656876DSC_0673



This is either AX826 or AX828, both of which were at Boscombe Down in September 1940. Initial reports stating that it was pleasant to fly with straight forward stalls, but its narrow track and gear was regarded as "twitchy". Comments included the placing together of the similar looking flap and fuel levers and contamination of the cockpit of fumes. Its maximum range, which was calculated at 930 miles from 136 gallons of fuel, which was
Can you imagine operating in those conditions with such narrow aspect landing gear? Just when you're off the ground, relaxing all the tight muscles, you still have to crank them up, then you can go after Japanese bombers and fighters… Now people whine and cry that one time a year, they have to crank up a crappy little OEM jack to change a flat tire on their car.
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
1942 HMS Formidable AM974

View attachment 693765

View attachment 693764



1667996192287.png
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Can you imagine operating in those conditions with such narrow aspect landing gear?

It might have been narrow, which it was, but it was surprisingly robust. The F4F remained operating in pretty rough conditions on Pacific landing strips throughout the war. I don't have to hand anything that displays failure rates because of the harsh conditions, but it is not something I have read. The F2A's gear was notoriously trouble prone.
 
Just when you're off the ground, relaxing all the tight muscles, you still have to crank them up, then you can go after Japanese bombers and fighters… Now people whine and cry that one time a year, they have to crank up a crappy little OEM jack to change a flat tire on their car.
I think those F4Fs are -4s. They had electric gear. -3s had the hand crank. This per an ex Naval Aviator who flew both from Henderson. He said with the -3 you cranked til it got hard, then poked the stick forward to unload gravity on the gear and help it come up the rest of the way. "Whatever you do, don't lose your grip on the crank; it'll flail around and break your forearm!" He had the scar to prove it.
 
I think those F4Fs are -4s. They had electric gear. -3s had the hand crank. This per an ex Naval Aviator who flew both from Henderson. He said with the -3 you cranked til it got hard, then poked the stick forward to unload gravity on the gear and help it come up the rest of the way. "Whatever you do, don't lose your grip on the crank; it'll flail around and break your forearm!" He had the scar to prove it.
Great bit of info, thanks!
 
I think those F4Fs are -4s. They had electric gear. -3s had the hand crank. This per an ex Naval Aviator who flew both from Henderson. He said with the -3 you cranked til it got hard, then poked the stick forward to unload gravity on the gear and help it come up the rest of the way. "Whatever you do, don't lose your grip on the crank; it'll flail around and break your forearm!" He had the scar to prove it.
I'm not aware of an Electric Gear in any F4F/FM.
 
Here are a couple of photos that always interested me…
47FF738F-BDB6-4D03-8177-16A96B94A5CA.jpeg


This was described as gun test firing on USS Ranger prior to Operation Torch… I always wondered if and how they test fired guns while on deck.

This next pic is captioned USS Hornet on route to Japan, during Doolittle Raid. I was always under the impression that the Hornet didn't have access to her fighters with the bombers aboard. Also of note from the same article this picture came from, the author states that Doolittle and another officer made test take-offs from the Hornet, to prove it could be done. I'd always heard the first take-offs were for the actual mission. Anyone ever heard of this?


588AC089-E728-489E-8C88-72DE740A485E.jpeg
 
Here are a couple of photos that always interested me…
View attachment 693891

This was described as gun test firing on USS Ranger prior to Operation Torch… I always wondered if and how they test fired guns while on deck.

This next pic is captioned USS Hornet on route to Japan, during Doolittle Raid. I was always under the impression that the Hornet didn't have access to her fighters with the bombers aboard. Also of note from the same article this picture came from, the author states that Doolittle and another officer made test take-offs from the Hornet, to prove it could be done. I'd always heard the first take-offs were for the actual mission. Anyone ever heard of this?


View attachment 693892
There was a trial at Norfolk Virginia referred to here (Wiki says 3 Feb 1942) to prove the concept.

There is a series of photos here taken during the mission.

Things to note
1. Some show SBDs on deck amongst the B-25B

2. The B-25B were respotted on the deck prior to being flown off. When they left the USA they were parked from the aft end of the flight deck to forward of the island. They were respotted aft to allow a greater take off distance.


And by take off time with the aftmost overhanging the aft end of the flight deck.

 
Last edited:
There was a trial at Norfolk Virginia referred to here (Wiki says 3 Feb 1942) to prove the concept.

There is a series of photos here taken during the mission.

Things to note
1. Some show SBDs on deck amongst the B-25B

2. The B-24B were respotted on the deck prior to being flown off. When they left the USA they were parked from the aft end of the flight deck to forward of the island. They were respotted aft to allow a greater take off distance.


And by take off time with the aftmost overhanging the aft end of the flight deck.

Thanks for the great info!
 
Martlet Royal Navy 1943

1668113846857.png


1668113868881.png


 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back