FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
True Matt, but if you bend one of these aircraft those are the numbers the Feds are going to be looking at...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Not necessarily. If those maximums are not part of AFM Sect 3, Operating Limitations, then they become an operating curriculum per Part 121 whose enforcement is much more fuzzy from a regulatory perspective. As you probably are well aware, this is where the special interest groups like ALPA and IFALPA quickly come into play with lawyers and their interpretations.
I rather doubt that the AFM states "crosswinds of X speed/direction are prohibited".
Maybe there was no pilot error about wind limit: if the wind force increased sharply when he was on finals he may have taken the right decision to attempt a landing when wind was whithin cleared parameters and had to face an emergency when force changed and he was too 'low and slow' to abort landing quickly.
I think this behemoths have a slow pick up time, if you are on finals and you apply full power probably you still need several seconds to wait for energy before attempting to climb.
More in this case when he had to work hard with rudder and aileron to counter the wind, so wasting a lot of energy.
I have little doubt that there will be some type of investigation which I hope will be published.
I was half expecting a queue of Lawyers forming to claim for stress iro the passengers
You do have a point....It's Germany - you can only expect serious damages to be paid if you are partially or totally disabled for work. Different legal system, too - no ambulance chasing around here. Don't ask me why ...
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)