highest kill ratio (4 Viewers)

so...but definitely many who underclaimed were people who did not want to make noise about killing enemies en masse..
Like who, for example?
 
It may be so...but definitely many who underclaimed were people who did not want to make noise about killing enemies en masse...or enjoyed if the other claimed and were just keeping up the morale and positive spirit in the unit.

Heh?

Show me a fighter pilot who does not want to make noise?

Sorry, but this is a reach.
 
Heh?

Show me a fighter pilot who does not want to make noise?

Sorry, but this is a reach.
You have to remember that after Stalingrad everyone knew we were going to loose the game we did not start.

Why make noise if the verdict after the war was hanging or a 10 year trip to gulag.

Even a membership in boy scouts was deemed criminal in the eyes of the victor.
 
You have to remember that after Stalingrad everyone knew we were going to loose the game we did not start.

Why make noise if the verdict after the war was hanging or a 10 year trip to gulag.

Even a membership in boy scouts was deemed criminal in the eyes of the victor.
You talk as though Finland was occupied by the Soviets at the end of WWII.
 
You have to remember that after Stalingrad everyone knew we were going to loose the game we did not start.

Why make noise if the verdict after the war was hanging or a 10 year trip to gulag.

Even a membership in boy scouts was deemed criminal in the eyes of the victor.

Your hypothesis is that during the continuation war Finnish fighter pilots under-claimed enemy aircraft destroyed because they were afraid of Soviet retribution after the war?

I think on the face of it that doesn't make much sense but it doesn't mean you're necessarily wrong--it would just be a very odd phenomenon. Especially since other Axis fighter pilots continued to over claim combat results at typical rates up to the end of the conflict. It seems to me that any anxiety about post-war retribution would be based more generally on one's status as an officer in the Finnish Air Force, not on how many Soviet aircraft he reported destroyed on this or that sortie.

Actually, I should clarify that: I do think you're necessarily wrong about that being a widespread pattern, since it appears to be a basic fact that on the whole Finnish fighter pilots (like all WW2 fighter pilots) over claimed enemy aircraft destroyed by a significant margin. But whether it ever occurred in any one instance? I'm theoretically open to it. I'd just need to see some evidence.
 
Your hypothesis is that during the continuation war Finnish fighter pilots under-claimed enemy aircraft destroyed because they were afraid of Soviet retribution after the war?

I think on the face of it that doesn't make much sense but it doesn't mean you're necessarily wrong--it would just be a very odd phenomenon. Especially since other Axis fighter pilots continued to over claim combat results at typical rates up to the end of the conflict. It seems to me that any anxiety about post-war retribution would be based more generally on one's status as an officer in the Finnish Air Force, not on how many Soviet aircraft he reported destroyed on this or that sortie.

Actually, I should clarify that: I do think you're necessarily wrong about that being a widespread pattern, since it appears to be a basic fact that on the whole Finnish fighter pilots (like all WW2 fighter pilots) over claimed enemy aircraft destroyed by a significant margin. But whether it ever occurred in any one instance? I'm theoretically open to it. I'd just need to see some evidence.
Well I mentioned that Mauno Fräntilä did not count his kills at all. It may be because he was devoted christian.
 
Well I mentioned that Mauno Fräntilä did not count his kills at all. It may be because he was devoted christian.
Interesting. Surely his unit counted aircraft destroyed though. Typically command wants to know whether any results were gained from a mission.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back