Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
WHaaaat? How dare youDue to difficulty of exiting the aircraft, the A4D was called All Four Dead.
No- but I wish I hadHave you seen footage of the RNZAF A4D aerobatic team doing their show with two aircraft tied together by the in-flight refueling hose?
Cant find it on youtube but it was common about 20 years back
Hi nuuumann,
And abseiling in New Zealand with those Huey beauties.
Have you seen footage of the RNZAF A4D aerobatic team doing their show with two aircraft tied together by the in-flight refueling hose?
Excellent stuff! I'm sure he was involved with Bob Laidlaw who started Flight Systems. After the "Saber Sunday" crash, the FAA began the LOA requirement for warbirds (rightfully so). I know Al Redick's son Alby, great guy, very honest businessman.There was a long pre history to that F-86 crash. The owner pilot tried to buy the aircraft from Fighter Imports at Chino but Leroy had a policy that you had to do x hours in one of his T-33s and reach a certain level of proficiency before he would sell you a Sabre. This guy flunked badly so he paid someone else to do Leroys program and buy the aircraft. The aircraft was then almost immediately taken over by the clown who flew it on its last flight.
This is a photo I took at Reno 72 of Leroy and one of his Canadair Sabres. His hand was injured minutes before he was to take off and demo the aircraft so he asked Bob Hoover to fly it instead. Bob demured at first but Leroy eventually convinced him. The resulting display was breathtaking as Bob used a hollow on the far side of the runway to do a low level pass with only the fin visible. I will try and find the photo.
View attachment 662736
Al, Redick Jim Noble, ??? and Leroy Penhall (with bandaged hand)
The commentary to that video notes A US Air force F-100 Supersabre jet rounds out high in nose-high attitude, during attempted emergency landing at Edwards Air Force Base, California. The pilot applies power to go around without success as the F-100 enters a state known as a "Sabre Dance".
Hi nuuumann,The Kiwi A-4s had a raft of avionic mods make to keep them current, including shoehorning in the APG-66 radar into the nose and carriage of Maverick missiles. A mate of mine I used to work with was with 75 Sqn when they had the Skyhawks said that the A-4, not being a big aircraft, boxes were squeezed in everywhere and jobs had to be done with one hand only through small access doors. One-handed lockwire invisible to the eye is painful, especially when the wire goes up under your fingernails...
A-4K office. This is NZ6215 as pictured earlier.
View attachment 662807A-4 panel
Not a problem. I am a retired railroad employee so now I can enjoy a good derailment.Hi nuuumann,
.....especially when the wire goes up under your fingernails...
thanks a lot for all the great photos and information - yes I dig that aircraft and anything to do with the Ngāti Tūmatauenga (God's warriors)
If IIRC most of the RNZAF A-4's at Butterworth/Malaysia and Changi/Singapore were from the 75 Sqn.?
Personally I never understood the German governments or Luftwaffe's reasons for purchasing the Alpha Jet instead of opting for the far more capable and proven A-4
Another strange bird was Malaysia, having ordered 90-100 A-4, taking delivery of around 40 and having forgotten about the remaining A-4's (have you got words)?
In case you can still remember - what purpose do these red encircled metal plaques serve?
Regards
Jagdflieger
SaparotRob - sorry for having derailed your thread. It's just when the A-4 comes in, I just can't......
If IIRC most of the RNZAF A-4's at Butterworth/Malaysia and Changi/Singapore were from the 75 Sqn.?
Absolutely, undeniably true.
what purpose do these red encircled metal plaques serve?
Two credible sources (a man who imported a pair of Jordanian 104 and a guy who worked on airframe overhaul in Germany), both told me the same thing. That the F104S with reaction tips and blown flaps had solved the high AOA on landing hazard and the low altitude stalls issue. Too late.The F-104 was the "Widow Maker". The B-26 was the "Widow Maker". Another "Widow Maker" was just mentioned in the Most Important Battle of WW 2 thread. Just how many "Widow Makers" are there?
We might be getting into Caidin territory.
AroundI met several people who flew the F-104 (including a former boss) and they loved the aircraft.
Around 1980 I was by the sea by my Grandmothers home town in Ostfreisland (just west of Bremerhaven) and suddenly there were two F104 right overhead at maybe 600' in full AB doing a hard skidding nose up turn. I felt physical pain in my chest from the wonderful sound those mighty J79. Later it was suggested to me the pilots had screwed up and meant to avoid flying overland but had made noise and cattle fright far worse by making maximum effort to turn away.I met several people who flew the F-104 (including a former boss) and they loved the aircraft.
That is what I was having in mind too - thanks for confirmingThey are checklists. At a quick glance the pilot follows the sequence of functions in order!
To be clear, I never worked on the A-4 while it was in service, just once it had been retired. I did work on the UH-1, C-130 and P-3.
What many people might not be aware about, is that the "real" widow maker in the new Luftwaffe, was the Republic F-84F Thunderstreak
Operational from November 1956 to 1967, out of 450 aircraft's delivered, 167 crashed - something must have been fundamentally wrong with this aircraft.
Even though having been a Strikefighter, the Recon version Republic RF-84F, out of 102 aircraft's delivered 21 crashed.
Regards
Jagdflieger
The F-84F-5-RE had the 7330 lb.st. J65-W-3 or the equivalent Buick-built J65-B-3. The deliveries of this version began in the latter part of 1953. The first F-84F-25-RE (51-1621) appeared at the end of 1953. It introduced an "all-flying" horizontal tailplane, in which the entire horizontal tail moved as a unit. The earlier F-84Fs suffered from a high-g stall pitch-up tendency which was often severe enough to tear the wings off the aircraft. The all-flying tail provided more positive control which helped to alleviate this problem, although the F-84F continued to operate under maneuverability restrictions throughout much of its service life.
Totally agree. My father stuck in Training Command as Instructor and training command squadron leader, volunteered for CBI and ETO combat assignment, finally opted to volunteer for B-26 assignment. He loved the B-26 performance and zero problem adapting to landing speed. Laughed when comparing to fully loaded F-104/F015 later in life.After entering service with the USAAF aviation units, the B-26 Marauder quickly received the reputation of a "Widowmaker" due to the early models' high accident rate during takeoffs and landings.
This was because the Marauder had to be flown at precise airspeeds, particularly on final runway approach or when one engine was out. The unusually high 150 mph (241 km/h) speed on short final runway approach was intimidating to many pilots who were used to much slower approach speeds, and whenever they slowed to speeds below those stipulated in the manual, the aircraft would often stall and crash