Improve That Design: How Aircraft Could Have Been Made Better (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

So, what exactly is a Valentine?
This is a Valentine, of the Canadian variety. It is these, and Canada's Hurricanes that I want to ship to North Africa and/or Malaya instead of to Russia.



As it was, IIRC many of both intended for the USSR ended up being lost at sea, something that would have spared any shipped to Malaya via Vancouver.
 
Last edited:
You want figures, but the official Wright Field tests are somehow wrong. And there were two P-39N tests that verified those climb numbers, one at WEP and one without. No WEP available over the critical altitude anyway. POH climb rates are always lower than comparable tests, for every AAF plane. POH was a guide for the pilots, not the results of an official test.

Russian P-39 claims are available, just search.
 
They all took off on internal, cruised out on external and came back on internal.

Not quite what you said earlier, then it was.
1, warm up on external
2, taxi out on external.
3. take off on internal
4, switch to external in a minute
5, then cruise out out external.
6. come back in internal
.
So if we ignore or change items 1, 2 and quite possibly 4 then your latest statement is correct.
 
To develop its own tank forces, Canada had established tank production facilities. An order was placed in 1940 with Canadian Pacific and after modifications to the Valentine design to use local standards and materials, the production prototype was finished in 1941. Canadian production was mainly at CPR Angus Shops in Montreal and 1,420 were produced in Canada of 1,388 were sent to the Soviet-Union, with 2,394 exported from Britain. They formed the main Commonwealth export to the Soviet Union under lend-lease. The remaining 32 were retained for training. The use of local GMC Detroit Diesel engines in Canadian production was a success and the engine was adopted for British production. British and Canadian production totaled 8,275, making the Valentine the most produced British tank design of the war. Valentine tank - Wikipedia
 
View attachment 609939
a small, slow, not very well armed tank with thick armor, was more reliable than many British tanks though.

The Valentine in the photo is one of the late versions with a long barrelled 57 mm (6 pdr) cannon, so it had better A/T capacity than a standard Sherman, late Churchills, Cromwells used in the ETO or T-34/76 and KV-1. Soviets even used them sometimes for Tiger hunting because it was small. fairly silent and had a good A/T capacity. Valentine was the only British tank that Soviets asked more and it was kept in production after British thought it was obsolescent only because of the Soviet demands.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread