Interesting read.
THE CONTRIBUTION BY P-47 THUNDERBOLT UNITS TO THE VICTORY IN EUROPE IN WWII
A LITTLE HISTORY LESSON
BY RALPH C. JENKINS, COL. USAF (RET.)
(WITH T. R. BARDUE)
Probably the most under-reported story of World War II, as it was intensely waged on the western front in Europe between April 1944 and May 1945, relates to the cooperative teamwork between the US Army ground forces and P-47 Thunderbolt fighter-bomber units of the US Ninth Air Force. I will be talking about. this great. Republic Aviation Company airplane in an effort to give it the credit deserved for its vital roles in defeating Germany in Europe as a part of World War II.
"My" 405th Fighter-Bomber Group, judging from the fact that all three squadrons remained in service until the 1990s, was one of the deadliest, if in fact the least storied by historians, fighting units in U.S. history. (The Squadron I commanded for several months after D-Day, the 510th, remains on active duty at Aviano, Italy with its F- 16s and was heavily involved in the Kosovo War. The 509th and 511th were, to the best of my recollection , based at Upper-Heyford flying A-10s in the 20th Fighter Wing. It has 6 squadrons versus the normal three. They were probably deactivated around ten years ago.)
The first question to clear up now at the outset of my comments would be the air order of battle - or more simply, those fighting units which day-in and day-out., week-after-week and month-after-month provided vital low-level close air support to our infantry, artillery and armored units. The bomber elements of the 9th Air Force - the so-called Invasion Air Force - consisted of Martin B-26 and Douglas A-20 aircraft which flew in boxes at 10, to 12,000 feet conducting level bombing. That Invasion Force's fighter aviation consisted of the Lockheed P-38, North American P-51, and Republic P-47 in the following numerical relationship: One Group of P-38s filling the role of reconnaissance, one Group of Mustangs (P-51), and fifteen Groups of P-47 fighter-bombers. 94 percent of all direct support, ground attack missions thus were flown in designer Alexander Kartveli's versitile, ultimate dream fighter, the Thunderbolt, by probably the most. intrepid pilots churned out of America's cadet schools. And our low-level attack and ground-support function offered many more opportunities and ways to lose life and limb to enemy action than did any other form of aerial activity.
Most WW II historians have tended to lump together all fighter and attack aircraft, without. regard to whether they were in the 8th Air Force in predominantly bomber escort rolls from England or Italy, or in the 9th Air Force that would be flexibly based on the Continent as close as possible and practicable to the fluid front lines for the main purpose of supporting our ground forces, as fighter-bombers assisting the infantry and armor to forge ahead against the Germans. Our `bombing' was 90 percent divebombing, From D-Day on, the 8th Fighter command was 90 percent Mustang equipped. These aircraft did their superb job of escort and , when on a given mission they were relieved by another P-51 outfit, they customarily descended to the deck to strafe German trains and airfields while more or less independently enroute to their home stations across the English Channel. But, in terms of helping fill the prisoner-of war ranks or lonely foreign graves after introduction to the multiple barrels of German 20mm flak guns (today termed `Triple A') they also paid the same high price as many of the 9th Air Force P-47 pilots would and did. Thus, the 8th Air Force fighters seldom performed close ground support of our armies as the 9th was assigned to do; the two forces had some different, specialized fish to fry.
There was no "A" type - i.e., `attack' aircraft - in the theater that could actually perform its original, theoretical drawing-board planned task; that is, an active, effective career of attacking ground targets from or at low levels. The A-20, principally augmenting the Martin B-26, didn't do it; it did not go down on the deck and daunt the barrels of flak guns assigned to German Panzar divisions. In my judgment, potential losses of this sassy little Douglas twin, and/or any aircraft using the in-line Merlin or Allison liquid-cooled engine ordered to do so, would have been unacceptably high, Aircraft such as the P-39 (Bell), P-40 (Curtis), A-24 (Douglas), A-35 (Vultee) and A-36 (an altered look-alike P-51), simply weren't to be found in American hands over Europe, although, of the 200+ Vultee A-31/35s built, there were some bought by the British and some flown in American bomb groups doing domestic chores, mostly `taxiing' the brass around or towing gunnery sleeve targets. Each of these types mentioned had some characteristic, or its plural, that made it dangerously unsuited for dive-bombing and low-level strafing of an alerted enemy in a way that was effective. Moreover, I'm aware of no naval or marine ground attack air units being used over Germany or occupied France. That left the horsepower, the rugged durability, the speed, and the pure mass of the big Republic P-47 to finally prove that it was the best of designs in the variety of combat situations we encountered in meeting the demands of low-level support and interdiction assignments.
Aside from all its virtues as a fighter-bomber, the old (original) `razorback' P-47s did have a serious flaw, it must be said, which had something to do with pilot training and everything to do with combat flying. Its rearward visibility from the enclosed cockpit was badly limited, making it impossible for a pilot to scan his 'six o'clock' position for following - which meant `pursuing' - friendly or unfriendly traffic. You cannot have this condition in a single-engine fighter, but all of the older Jugs' did. The fact that this airplane could out-dive any thing in the enemy aviation arsenal (for most of World War II) was an advantage only until the diving was over with.
THE CONTRIBUTION BY P-47 THUNDERBOLT UNITS TO THE VICTORY IN EUROPE IN WWII
A LITTLE HISTORY LESSON
BY RALPH C. JENKINS, COL. USAF (RET.)
(WITH T. R. BARDUE)
Probably the most under-reported story of World War II, as it was intensely waged on the western front in Europe between April 1944 and May 1945, relates to the cooperative teamwork between the US Army ground forces and P-47 Thunderbolt fighter-bomber units of the US Ninth Air Force. I will be talking about. this great. Republic Aviation Company airplane in an effort to give it the credit deserved for its vital roles in defeating Germany in Europe as a part of World War II.
"My" 405th Fighter-Bomber Group, judging from the fact that all three squadrons remained in service until the 1990s, was one of the deadliest, if in fact the least storied by historians, fighting units in U.S. history. (The Squadron I commanded for several months after D-Day, the 510th, remains on active duty at Aviano, Italy with its F- 16s and was heavily involved in the Kosovo War. The 509th and 511th were, to the best of my recollection , based at Upper-Heyford flying A-10s in the 20th Fighter Wing. It has 6 squadrons versus the normal three. They were probably deactivated around ten years ago.)
The first question to clear up now at the outset of my comments would be the air order of battle - or more simply, those fighting units which day-in and day-out., week-after-week and month-after-month provided vital low-level close air support to our infantry, artillery and armored units. The bomber elements of the 9th Air Force - the so-called Invasion Air Force - consisted of Martin B-26 and Douglas A-20 aircraft which flew in boxes at 10, to 12,000 feet conducting level bombing. That Invasion Force's fighter aviation consisted of the Lockheed P-38, North American P-51, and Republic P-47 in the following numerical relationship: One Group of P-38s filling the role of reconnaissance, one Group of Mustangs (P-51), and fifteen Groups of P-47 fighter-bombers. 94 percent of all direct support, ground attack missions thus were flown in designer Alexander Kartveli's versitile, ultimate dream fighter, the Thunderbolt, by probably the most. intrepid pilots churned out of America's cadet schools. And our low-level attack and ground-support function offered many more opportunities and ways to lose life and limb to enemy action than did any other form of aerial activity.
Most WW II historians have tended to lump together all fighter and attack aircraft, without. regard to whether they were in the 8th Air Force in predominantly bomber escort rolls from England or Italy, or in the 9th Air Force that would be flexibly based on the Continent as close as possible and practicable to the fluid front lines for the main purpose of supporting our ground forces, as fighter-bombers assisting the infantry and armor to forge ahead against the Germans. Our `bombing' was 90 percent divebombing, From D-Day on, the 8th Fighter command was 90 percent Mustang equipped. These aircraft did their superb job of escort and , when on a given mission they were relieved by another P-51 outfit, they customarily descended to the deck to strafe German trains and airfields while more or less independently enroute to their home stations across the English Channel. But, in terms of helping fill the prisoner-of war ranks or lonely foreign graves after introduction to the multiple barrels of German 20mm flak guns (today termed `Triple A') they also paid the same high price as many of the 9th Air Force P-47 pilots would and did. Thus, the 8th Air Force fighters seldom performed close ground support of our armies as the 9th was assigned to do; the two forces had some different, specialized fish to fry.
There was no "A" type - i.e., `attack' aircraft - in the theater that could actually perform its original, theoretical drawing-board planned task; that is, an active, effective career of attacking ground targets from or at low levels. The A-20, principally augmenting the Martin B-26, didn't do it; it did not go down on the deck and daunt the barrels of flak guns assigned to German Panzar divisions. In my judgment, potential losses of this sassy little Douglas twin, and/or any aircraft using the in-line Merlin or Allison liquid-cooled engine ordered to do so, would have been unacceptably high, Aircraft such as the P-39 (Bell), P-40 (Curtis), A-24 (Douglas), A-35 (Vultee) and A-36 (an altered look-alike P-51), simply weren't to be found in American hands over Europe, although, of the 200+ Vultee A-31/35s built, there were some bought by the British and some flown in American bomb groups doing domestic chores, mostly `taxiing' the brass around or towing gunnery sleeve targets. Each of these types mentioned had some characteristic, or its plural, that made it dangerously unsuited for dive-bombing and low-level strafing of an alerted enemy in a way that was effective. Moreover, I'm aware of no naval or marine ground attack air units being used over Germany or occupied France. That left the horsepower, the rugged durability, the speed, and the pure mass of the big Republic P-47 to finally prove that it was the best of designs in the variety of combat situations we encountered in meeting the demands of low-level support and interdiction assignments.
Aside from all its virtues as a fighter-bomber, the old (original) `razorback' P-47s did have a serious flaw, it must be said, which had something to do with pilot training and everything to do with combat flying. Its rearward visibility from the enclosed cockpit was badly limited, making it impossible for a pilot to scan his 'six o'clock' position for following - which meant `pursuing' - friendly or unfriendly traffic. You cannot have this condition in a single-engine fighter, but all of the older Jugs' did. The fact that this airplane could out-dive any thing in the enemy aviation arsenal (for most of World War II) was an advantage only until the diving was over with.
Last edited: