- Thread starter
- #321
Lucky13
Forum Mascot
I thought that we got over this....

Source: The National Interest https://share.google/rLhKT5dxLA3ZIHeMb

Source: The National Interest https://share.google/rLhKT5dxLA3ZIHeMb
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

interesting that the first Embraer Gripen has flown tho.
Link not workingI thought that we got over this....
Source: The National Interest https://share.google/rLhKT5dxLA3ZIHeMb
This isn't quite the same as previous BS 'reporting'. The engine talked about here (the RM12EP) is a modification of the existing RM12 (which itself is a derivative of the F404) already used. I am actually meeting with the GKN Aerospace team involved in a few weeks and will find out more about the specific changes.
This isn't quite the same as previous BS 'reporting'. The engine talked about here (the RM12EP) is a modification of the existing RM12 (which itself is a derivative of the F404) already used. I am actually meeting with the GKN Aerospace team involved in a few weeks and will find out more about the specific changes.
Yeah, it's real - not much in that article though. Here is the actual GKN media release:Thank f....ishfingers for that!
The article is....well, safe to read then?![]()
aeronewsglobal.com
Still American-based engines though. SAAB needs to break free from the US government's ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) and EAR (Export Administration Regulations). Of course it's more than just engines, but that's a big piece.
It is more than the engine on the Gripen that has US origin. EAR is less of an issue than ITAR.Still American-based engines though. SAAB needs to break free from the US government's ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) and EAR (Export Administration Regulations). Of course it's more than just engines, but that's a big piece.
Yes, I wrote exactly that above, which you quoted.It is more than the engine on the Gripen that has US origin.
Yeah, on reflection, my bad.Yes, I wrote exactly that above, which you quoted.
You're over....worked, have a pint!![]()
I admit that I always had a soft spot for the Grippen. I tend to view it as the next F16, with the F35, Typhoon as the F15's in the next generation of fighters. Very effective but more affordable.
With the inevitable Defence budget cuts that are on the way I wouldn't be taken aback if the UK dropped the F35 and purchased Grippens.
Naturally politics will play a bigger role than capability in deciding what gets chosen. A recent Norwegian report defied common sense and logic by publicly claiming that the F-35 was cheaper than the Gripen! The only parallel I can think of was 45 years ago when US influence (possibly) or idiocy (even odds) led to a UK report that claimed that buying the F-111 (still beset by its own problems) would be cheaper than continuing with the TSR 2, despite the latter having 2 complete prototypes, a third almost complete, and component manufacture already underway for the first 40 aircraft! What a waste.
Here we go again...Answer to that mystery is malfeasance / bribes