Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Dennis David, who saw JFK's wounds on autopsy photos, indicates where he saw an entry wound.
Anytime....When do we move onto King and Bobby
Interesting - that transcript reads like me lying to my mom when I was 8 years old about getting in trouble in school.
"yeah, well sort of, a little bit, kinda, but not really, actually no..."
Despite the gross anatomical damage, the man above can discern a "small hole" from a "postmortem photo"? Where are those photos now?
The LAPD did not want another fiasco so they quickly gathered evidence so well they actually destroyed critical evidence. Despite the signs of those times I'd find it ironic that another "nut" would come out and pop RFK just for his anger over RFK's support for Israel. Sirhan Sirhan was a Lebanese Christian and displayed some real bizzare behavior prior to the assassination. Two theories exist.What do you think about Robert Kennedy's assasination? I've seen a couple of documentaries about it and to say the least there was something shady in the investigation. Witnesses harassed, etc.
Yes, and that witness was badgered and bullied by the LAPD...Good info FlyboyJ. I recall one more thing, a female witness who saw two persons, a woman and a man, leaving the Ambassador Hotel via back door. The woman was saying to the man "We shot him, We shot him". Later that witness was told by the police/FBI that she actually heard "they shot him, they shot him".
• LA Coroner Thomas Noguchi, determined that the fatal shot came from about an inch away, right under Kennedy's ear. Thus the shot came from behind Kennedy, while Sirhan was several feet in front of him. In his autobiography Noguchi stated, ""Until more is precisely known…the existence of a second gunman remains a possibility. Thus, I have never said that Sirhan Sirhan killed Robert Kennedy." 7
• Sirhan Sirhan's revolver held a maximum of eight bullets. Kennedy was shot four times: one shot entered the head behind the right ear, a second one near the right armpit, a third just below the second and a fourth that went through Kennedy's jacket but did not hit his body. Five other people were shot in addition to Kennedy, one of whom was shot twice. Barring any more "magic bullets," that is a total of 10 bullets.
I'm in Dallas texas this weekend.
Funny I saw this thread as I just got back from Dealy Plaza and the JFK assasination museum.
When I get back home, I will post the picture for everyone to enjoy.
Note to any of you who are also railfans..... theres a light rail station right next to this place. If you want to visit the museum, take the train.
I doubt the truth to this..But I read somewhere that there is a 'sign' at the old depository/JFK museum that says "No guns allowed".
And it was the same defense team that argued that Sirhan seemed to be hypnotized with little or no recollection of the incident.From FLYBOY above.
In 1968, an investigator on Sirhan's defense team asked Sirhan why he didn't shoot Kennedy between the eyes. He was definitely close enough to the senator and, because it is accepted that he was in front of Kennedy, it would have been the most effective shot to take. Apparently, shooting Kennedy in the face was precisely what Sirhan had intended to do. Sirhan immediately replied, "Because the son of a bitch turned his head at the last second."
Heard that as well but the LAPD destroyed the place so it couldn't be proven or dis-proven.From Dan Moldea's book, The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy, Moldea believes that the bullet holes in the wooden door panel that were seen in photographs of the crime scene were not actually bullet holes and that untrained eyes probably identified them incorrectly.
I never heard that but I find question in that whole scenario. It doesn't matter if the gun sat for a while, residue doesn't create the bullet fingerprint of the gun, it's the barrel bullet combination. Even if residue or corrosion is formed in the barrel, the fingerprint of the bullet exiting the gun shouldn't really change.Another conspiracy issue was that bullets fired in 1975, from Sirhan's gun bore a different marking to those recovered from the assassination crime scene. However Moldea interviewed several police officers who admitted that Sirhan's gun had been reloaded and fired privately after the shooting so that officers could have souvenir bullets fired from the gun that killed Robert Kennedy. These extra shots-the exact number of which is not known-created a residue in the barrel of Sirhan's pistol that resulted in the 1975 bullets bearing different markings than the eight fired by Sirhan.
I never heard that but I find question in that whole scenario. It doesn't matter if the gun sat for a while, residue doesn't create the bullet fingerprint of the gun, it's the barrel bullet combination. Even if residue or corrosion is formed in the barrel, the fingerprint of the bullet exiting the gun shouldn't really change.