Late war fighter competition

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

North Sea, or Norwegian waters perhaps? Or Northern Adriatic deployment for Bearcat vs. Luftwaffe?


Sea Fury is my bird again, or P-47N if one wants great performance durability combined with great range (but no carrier landings obviously).
 
Lets not worry "how" the naval fighters get there. Lets just put them in the fight, maybe land based naval units.

Maybe Soren or someone with similar talent, can come up with some performance tables of some of the main players we have spoke about.

I know on paper the Bearcat doesn't have all of the best statistics, but I think it would be an overall exceptional fighter, in Fighter vs Fighter confrontation. I would be interested in finding out how well it was able to turn.

The Hawker is very good too. I think though its slightly heavier weight would make it tough to out fight the F8F. Same as the P-47N, which is even heavier.

I still wonder how the twin engines planes such as the F7F and the Hornet would compete against some of these great single engine fighters?
 
It appears to me the Bearcat is a dogfighter. Which makes sense since CV aircraft typically operate at medium and low altitude. It might not fare too well at 30,000 feet against 500 mph aircraft using boom zoom tactics.
 
The Ta-152 was probably the best dogfighter of the lot, it featured a very high lift wing design very well suited for turn fighting. And with 2500 hp performance at all alts would've been extreme.
 
Perhaps so. However if I have a speed advantage of 25 to 50 mph I would probably boom zoom. It's inheritly safer then entering an aerial furball. Erich Hartmann scored 352 kills this way and lived to write a book about it. 8)
 
Perhaps so. However if I have a speed advantage of 25 to 50 mph I would probably boom zoom. It's inheritly safer then entering an aerial furball. Erich Hartmann scored 352 kills this way and lived to write a book about it. 8)

I daresay most WW2 kills were done this way - very unsporting. Does anyone have any statistics on boom zoom vs other successful tactics please ?
 
remove the Do 335, the comparisons as a what if cannot be used, no operational experience, but maybe that is ok with the members ........ ?
 
The Ta-152H powered by the Jumo 213EB takes the prize IMHO. With 2500 hp and a top speed of over 500 mph there was no other piston engined fighter which could rival it.

The P-47M/N with a flat rated 2800 hp from 10k to 33,000 ft easily out-powers the Ta-152 even with the EB, up to the P-47 ceiling and at 35k this power difference is probably about 1500 hp providing a substantial power to weight advantage (over 100% more power)! For 1945 Europe, the P-47 could easily be lightened (less fuel carried since no long range escorts and reduced armament) and, if required, I am sure Republic could re-wing the P-47 (already done for the N) as easily as the Focke-Wulf did for the 190/152. According to your chart, the EB performance is still considerably below the P-51H and the Tempest II in speed below 25k ft and at a disadvantage in climb below 20-25k. Of course I am not even looking at the -11 engine in the P-51, which has higher altitude performance. Above 20-25k the Ta would dominate these planes, but then there is that doggone P-47. The P-47J already had achieved 500 mph. Your chart appears never to show the EB generating more than about 172 mph and it looks like nitrous is not used. Am I misreading the chart, I have done that before? Unfortunately I cannot even mention the P-72 which already had a year in development and was in production before being cancelled in favor of jets.

davebender said:
Kurt Tank, the designer of the Ta-152, when interviewed, claimed to have evaded siz Mustangs while flying the Ta-152, by virtue of its superior speed. He revealed that a planned version of the aircraft featuring a Jumo 222 engine would reach 500 mph.

Since the Ta-152 has a clean top speed of about 370 mph at SL and a 1945 fighter-weight P-51D has a clean top speed of about 380 mph at SL, it is unlikely Kurt could evade the P-51s using superior speed. Now if the Ta had no racks and the P-51Ds did, then the Ta probably could slowly ease away. Most likely, the P-51s never saw the Ta. Did the 222 engine ever work?
 
as Tank did not fly an H model it is not known 100 % if he had MW-50 installed in his C-0 variant he was flying,, if so yes he would of sped away. but to confirm that he had 6 P-51's on his butt is a bit much. there is of course the possibility that this story is nothing but myth to help promote the qualities of the little know to be fighter
 
Heh, as a member of the Commonwealth, I've gotta stick my oar in for the Commonwealth CA-15 "Kangaroo"
Commonwealth CA-15


There were drawbacks; light armament and 448 mph was not a great deal better than the P-51D. Still, worth throwing in as something different to the usual run of Bearcats etc.
 
Ok, so your fighter command has the task of performing fighter sweeps and escorting medium bombers into North East Germany around the North Sea. Allied positions are flying south from Sweden. You know the Luftwaffe is operating several groups of Ta 152's in the area. The allied advance has slowed and not yet gone into Germany proper, so the fighter sweeps are intended to soften the Luftwaffe, along with medium bomber escorts that are tactical in nature, attacking the German ground forces that are preventing continued invasion. The Me262 factories have been hit hard by 8th AF bombers so they have a minimal affect, and when deployed are going after the heavies from England. So they are not a factor in this area.

You are the commanding officer of the theatre, and you have the choice of several new allied fighters to deploy in the area.

Which of these aircraft do you chose. I put this scenario in place because it does seem that the Focke Wulf appears to be favored by many, and respected by all as at least 1 of the best.
 

Okay, I'll buy that. Soren's chart shows a C-1 (I'm assuming the C-0 is similar) with SL speed of 388 mph while the P-51D's speed is 383 mph and the P-51B is 386 mph. All, I'm sure, is within the error of testing. I wouldn't say he "sped" away.

All in all, not a bad showing for a plane that had been flying and fighting since '43 against the best of the enemy could field in '45 (not including jets).
 

Hello
Your Ta 152 seems to be overquoted. It's power was about 2050 hp with MW-50 and Jumo 213 from various sources, not 2500. Moroever it's not proven that is was a better fignter than the usual D-9 at low and middle heights.

In that sense i think La-7 was more impressive than the Yak at low heights (635 km/h at SL and about 665 at 2600m with 1850 hp only). With an american/british 100 LL instead of its standard soviet benzine a simple Yak-9D was gaining about 20km/h IAS. Probably more for a La-5FN /La-7 family, by extrapolation.

Regards
 
Last edited:
How long are you expecting the European war to last? After another year of fighting the entire continent will be rubble and no longer worth fighting over.
 
How long are you expecting the European war to last? After another year of fighting the entire continent will be rubble and no longer worth fighting over.

Long enough for us to argue about it!! LOL

I am glad a defender of the Russian aircraft has joined the debate. I really like the Lavochkin La-7 too, maybe we can stretch and figure the La-9 would have been hurried into production.

My little mock layout of where the battle is fought works out for the Russian aircraft, coming from Poland.

With my scenario, it would be real easy to put the P-51H into the theater. The plane was already proven with the 8th AF. But that would be the logical choice, I rather prefer illogical.
 

Users who are viewing this thread