Macchi C.205 Vs. A6M5

True but what about energy fighting? Boom and zoom.
Absolutely! Providing "Guido" decides to fight that way instead of using aerobatics.
 
Other qualities such as?[/QUOTE

1. Faster climber.
2. Faster acceleration in the dive.
3. Close to twice the ammunition.
4. No figures yet, but probably rolls much quicker.
5. Beautiful piece of machinery, a Ferrari of the skies:cool:.

But still, in the Pacific, it could only be a point defense interceptor.
 
Last edited:
Why would you do school work?
 
noooooooo not another parent

1622764373976.png
 
bro the Italian plane after meeting the a6m5 would dive then with that speed increase altitude turn around and light him up

Bro, Joe is talking about real life, not a video game like War Thunder.
 
Keep in mind that the Spitfire comparison was Minguzzi's opinion and not from
direct comparison trials.
Taken from Spitfire into Battle. which is a collection of memories written by former RAF Capt. Duncan Smith:

"The Re.2005 'Sagittario' was a potent aircraft. Having had a dog-fight with one of them, I am convinced we would have been hard pressed to cope in our Spitfires operationally, if the Italians or Germans had had a few Squadrons equipped with these aircraft at the beginning of the Sicily campaign or in operations from Malta. Fast, and with excellent maneuverability, the Re.2005 was altogether a superb airplane. Neither the Macchi 205 nor the Bf 109G measured up to the capabilities of the Re.2005 series in maneuverability or rate of climb. I think it was easily the best aircraft Italy produced".
 
You are one lucky guy.
u sure
 
Then we're in agreement, not in a disagreement.
yes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back