Me 109, Spitfire, Zero or Mustang

Which plane would you fly in a dogfight?


  • Total voters
    64

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I actually do not like the Mustang. When compared to its radial engine counter parts in the USAF, USN, and USMC, it was fragile. For example, how many 'Stangs were lost because of a hit on a coolant line. A hit in the same place on a 'Bolt, for example, all you did was tick off the pilot and the crew chief. I am not minimizing the role of the P-51, but it does, in my experience, has an almost cult following. HMMMMM, its almost like those guys who like Spits, 109s, and Lancs. Things that make you go HMMMMM
;{P

Still, I guess that was a problem with liquid cooled engines. I wonder was the pilot surviviability of a 109 vs a P-51. I exclude a Zero because anything above a spit wad would shred it. Still I don't think the 'Stang was the best plane the US had. If you want to compare kill ratios the Hellcat and Corsair were well above it and the P-47 gave it a run for its money.

:{)
 
I dont think comparing kill ratios between the Pacific and Europe really proves anything... Different combat, different enemy...

But.... I agree with Curzon entirely on his above post... If the P-47D was manufactured in such numbers as the P-51D, and used in the escort role exclusively, all these P-51 bandwagoneers would be P-47 bandwaggoneers.... Just about all the German pilots I have ever met, or even read about, said that the P-47 was a more dangerous enemy, but the #'s of Mustangs covering a bomber stream was more than the Luftwaffe could handle...

3 Stafflen vs 500 escorts??? Not very good odds is it???
 
Is it me or is he trying to call the Spitfire crap? Do I have to slap him?
 
Yes he did. He said that anyone who likes Spits, 109's and Lancs makes him go HMMMM!

That just shows me that the knowledge of aircraft he has is limited, either that or very very biased which gives him tunnel vision.
 
He is worse than Lanc for not liking the Spitfire it is blasephemy. Where as liking French bombers is just wrong.

I mean how can you not like it?
 

Attachments

  • supermarine_spitfire_mkvi_250.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 407
  • supermarine_spitfire_mkxvi_and_mkxiv_532.jpg
    89.1 KB · Views: 297
Ho Boy!!! If I would have known that my comment in jest would have made so many so snarky I would have sticked to cutting down French bombers. Allrighty just to let ya all know I pray at the Corsair altar so much that my wife sometimes gets jealous. So please don't slap me, beat me, or make me fly in a French Bomber. I happen to be very fond of Spits (the first WWII plane I saw in person), have flown in a Lanc (at an airshow in Texas more years ago than I care to recollect), but sadly have never seen a Me-109 in flight, just the Spanish versions. These and all WWII aircraft changed history and I will never diminsh that fact.

I think we are all hard-core fans of a genre that is all but forgotten by many younger than us and to me this a great way to remember and preserve history. We all fanatical to our particular aircraft so if you were insulted, I apologize, if you got and accepted my joke, laugh, and if you were insulted but still laughed, then I applaud you sence of humor. Turn the page.

:{)
 
*slap* By the way, I've got lanc flying a French bomber to your house ...I'm sure you'll both enjoy one another's company while in it. And then we'll blast you out of the sky with Spitfires ... who's filming it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread