Meanwhile, on the Eastern Front. . .

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Japanese merchant fleet was quite big. Perhaps you want to read into this. And building airfields in far places they also did very effectively. It was not that clean cut back then.
 
considering Hitler's statement from his book, his ultimate goal was to physically eliminate all slavic nations and replace them with "pure nordic" population, in fact holocaust was just prelude for far more horrifying events which nazis had in plan...
 
Japanese merchant fleet was quite big. Perhaps you want to read into this. And building airfields in far places they also did very effectively. It was not that clean cut back then.
Many Japanese forward airfields were not well built and their aircraft suffered for it. The Tainan air group at Rabaul, for example, lost a considerable amount of aircraft due to their field's poor condition.
In addition, the Japanese did not have a reliable supply network like the Allies, so getting supplies and materials to forward operation areas was not reliable and their ground and air units suffered for it. This only got worse as the war carried on.
 
Last edited:
Japanese merchant fleet was quite big. Perhaps you want to read into this. And building airfields in far places they also did very effectively. It was not that clean cut back then.
"Underway refueling and replenishment" was a reference to the American Pacific Fleet's ability to resupply its own ships while underway, so that the ships did not have to return to port to refuel. The Japanese did not have comparable ability.


 
Last edited:
Actually, the IJN was ahead of all other navies in regards to sea going replenishment at the start of the Pacific war.

 
Actually, the IJN was ahead of all other navies in regards to sea going replenishment at the start of the Pacific war.

Possibly. But that gets back to the necessity of winning the war quickly, with the material they had on hand at the beginning. Their difficulty with fighting a longer war was not just a problem of not having as much industrial capacity at home to build new ships and airplanes and rifles, but also a built-in weakness in their advance planning for field maintenance and new construction of facilities such as airfields. They started with a weak grasp of long-range logistics, and were not able to correct that weakness as the war progressed.

Here is an informative article I found on that topic. It's well worth a read.

 
Last edited:
Not everybody is agreed on that. The distance from the A-A line to the Ural Mountains is comparable to the distance from the USSR border to A-A.

If you know the difference, why use the wrong term? The USA was, after all, just another name for the Colonies.

But, seriously, this is a major historical mistake. Bolsheviks denied any connections with the Empire, were proud of creating a "new society" and "new nation" and banned historical/culture baggage of the "old" until the early 1940s when it became necessary to motivate people for another war. Even in the 1970-1980s Russian Empire was portraited in the Soviet propaganda as something just a bit less evil than the Third Reich and as a country that was not a foundation of the USSR. As one wise man said, the Soviet Union related to the Russian Empire as the hangman to the corpse of his victim.
 
What book exactly? All two are available on the Internet.
 
i think it is one of the thesis contained in "main kampf" - all areas located east from Wisla river will be subject of "purification and settlement by nordic nations". Of course wording is different but meaning remains the same. Nazis have started this process september 4th '39 with first mass execution of civilians in Bydgoszcz. A month later they did this once again in more organised way, capturing and killing majority of university teachers in Krakow - and that was just beginning - Poland have ended WW2 loosing every fourth citizen - from close to 40mln down tu slightly below 30.
 
Last edited:
The wording is very much different. As for the meanings, - one can only guess what Hitler thought in 1925 about the implementation of his "eastern" ideas. We do know, of course, what he did later.
When I read that dull and ill-written book many years ago, I was surprised not to find a lot of what was attributed to that book. And to discover what was omitted.
Just looked quickly through one of the English translations and found the following.
"The fact was recognized that new territory could be gained only in the East; but this meant that there would be fighting ahead"
"...we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-War Germany in foreign policy. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East"
"But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her... Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way for us here."

The last two sentences are from Chapter XIV Germany's Policy in Eastern Europe. Where the author blabbers about everything else but the policy itself and writes about France as much as about Eastern Europe.

To conclude: no, there was no Hitler's statement in his books about the ultimate goal of the extermination of the Slavic nations. That does not make him any "better". But this fact can help to understand the dangerous unpredictabilities of totalitarian leaders and regimes.
 
Oh, sometimes I just like to kick back and be flippant and casual and even a little silly. I'm really not trying to start an actual debate, especially since I am more than capable of being exact and scholarly and proper when it's called for. My children have never really forgiven me for always correcting their grammar around the breakfast table (and other times). (But now they do the same to their own children.)
 

My, how things have changed since then!

Country (or territory)Gross tonnage (millions)[1]Deadweight tonnage (millions)[1]
World1,034.31,552.2
1​
Panama215.8330.8
European Union205.1293.2
2​
Liberia123.8193.3
3​
Marshall Islands81.1133.3
4​
Hong Kong78.5130.3
5​
Singapore59.291.7
6​
Bahamas48.363.3
7​
Malta45.070.3
8​
Greece41.172.9
9​
China38.861.2
10​
United Kingdom30.040.7

The United States is down at #22
 
McHale's Navy not included? Those guys made Klink and Schultz look smart sometimes.
 
As long as we're off thread, does anyone know if there is a copy of "Seven Against the Sea"? It was a Playhouse 90 episode or a similar. It was the basis of McHale's Navy. It was a drama.
 

Users who are viewing this thread