Medals/Awards

• Nov 8, 2004

• Thread starter
• #41

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

ok then Les:

Abrams - Good

Challenger II - Better.

 

• Nov 8, 2004

• #42

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,931

17

Dec 20, 2003

yeah i'm with CC, i'd much rather be in a Challenger II than a abrams.............

 

• Nov 8, 2004

• Thread starter
• #43

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

It is after all widely considered to be the best.

 

• Nov 8, 2004

• #44

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,825

48

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Im sure that the Brits think their tank is the best, just like us Americans think the Abrahms is the best....

I do not have any info on which tank is the better choice for armored combat, but I have seen what an Abrahms can do up close and personal... If u could provide some info to back up ur claim i would appreciate it....

 

• Nov 9, 2004

• Thread starter
• #45

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,259

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

The lanc could provide a good argument, I lack the knowledge. All I do know is that the Challenger II is far better than the Abrams.