Most Beautiful Aircraft

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I have to say although I'm not a jet fanatic I do like the BAC 221
 

Attachments

  • bac221_3_870.gif
    bac221_3_870.gif
    7.6 KB · Views: 950
  • 92_717.jpg
    92_717.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 924
Bugatti made an airplane?! do tell!

I'd have to go with P-40, spitfire, f-14, and f-16.

And what's wrong with the Flanker? I think it looks pretty slick.
 

Attachments

  • f14_b1024_273.jpg
    f14_b1024_273.jpg
    100.4 KB · Views: 1,085
I do obviously have a preferance but you have to go some way to beat this.

What initially attracted me to gliding were the gliders themselves.
 

Attachments

  • dg_300_855.jpg
    dg_300_855.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 894
Still prefer my choices...but then again I would. :lol:
 

Attachments

  • b1_1_841.jpg
    b1_1_841.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 836
  • tomcatsun_1024x768_157.jpg
    tomcatsun_1024x768_157.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 851
  • b29_2_300_2_773.jpg
    b29_2_300_2_773.jpg
    95.9 KB · Views: 847
  • g56_2_477.jpg
    g56_2_477.jpg
    105.6 KB · Views: 859
  • g59_406.jpeg
    g59_406.jpeg
    11.1 KB · Views: 860
  • 27percent20mig_17percent20n619mpercent20lazikpercent20rightpercent20frontpercent20afterburnerpercent
    27percent20mig_17percent20n619mpercent20lazikpercent20rightpercent20frontpercent20afterburnerpercent
    26.7 KB · Views: 447
  • hawker_hurricane_796.jpeg
    hawker_hurricane_796.jpeg
    28.5 KB · Views: 841
i'd rather have a Tu-160 than a B-1 and there's nothing special about the tomcat's looks, i will admit that's a good pic of the MiG-17 though.........
 
I didn't mean anything other than WW2 when I originally posted, but I like the way people have included jets.

As far as modern jets go; call me perverted if you will, but I just lurve the MiG 25 Foxbat.

mig-25-250x153.jpg
 
For Me the most 'beautiful' aircraft ever created were built for the Schneider Trophy; Of which by the most narrow of margins I choose the Gloster IV-B.

Images from >>>

http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/milesto...mage=1926-pc74-41-55-Gloster-IV.jpg&Year=1926

http://www.hydroretro.net/coupeen/avions/british27.html

From the NACA archive, download this very very informative article if you wish, a sample of which is posted. It was written in 1933, it touches on so many interesting points it is just killer, especially if you consider when it was written... http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/digidoc/report/tm/12/NACA-TM-712.PDF
 

Attachments

  • p_40c_jjgscfs_2_timetofly_rev_3_002_p_40_p_51_171.jpg
    p_40c_jjgscfs_2_timetofly_rev_3_002_p_40_p_51_171.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 679
  • naca_tech_memo_712_edit_pg15_801.jpg
    naca_tech_memo_712_edit_pg15_801.jpg
    133.4 KB · Views: 681
  • naca_tech_memo_712_edit_pg14_153.jpg
    naca_tech_memo_712_edit_pg14_153.jpg
    113.9 KB · Views: 682
  • 1926_pc74_41_55_gloster_iv_134.jpg
    1926_pc74_41_55_gloster_iv_134.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 665
  • british27_116.jpg
    british27_116.jpg
    95.9 KB · Views: 687
The fuselage is above the air intakes as a design attribute .... allows GOOD airflow at high angles of attack. The cockpit is up and bubbled for visibility.

I think the Flankers are beautiful! But, that's just me ...
 
GregP said:
The fuselage is above the air intakes as a design attribute .... allows GOOD airflow at high angles of attack.

That makes sense, boundary layer etc. - What plane are we talking about here? :confused:

Kiwimac said:
Kiwimac (who likes the Mig 25 too)

:D
 
I'll back you up on the Foxbat, I think it looks mean.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back