SaparotRob
Unter Gemeine Geschwader Murmeltier XIII
Well, with the help of you guys, I realize I made at least 2 glaring errors in my posts. I'm giving myself a time out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Well, with the help of you guys, I realize I made at least 2 glaring errors in my posts. I'm giving myself a time out.
It's another nod to the RAF linies that they could take an aircraft out of a box like an IKEA shelf and quickly knock it together.
View attachment 594193
View attachment 594194
IMO, the only thing wrong with the Buffalo was there weren't enough of them. Five squadrons of sixty active aircaft to patrol and defend a territory larger than the entire UK is untenable. Give Malaya Command sixty Spitfires or Meteor F3s and they're still doomed. But give them 400 Buffalos...
Uh... What?Well, with the help of you guys, I realize I made at least 2 glaring errors in my posts. I'm giving myself a time out.
It's smart to make your aircraft capable of being knocked down and reassembled in the field. Japan's main fighters, the A6M, Ki-43 and Ki-44 had mono-spar or monolithic wings, meaning the wing cannot be removed in parts for later reassembly in the field, as shown on the A6M Zero being restored below. The wing is one big piece from tip to tip. The only three ways to get your Zeros and Oscars to forward bases is to fly them there, find a freighter with wide open decks, or use an aircraft carrier as a ferry, as was done with the Hiyo class of light fleets after Midway.True on both parts, but Buffs' were hardly the only ones to come in a box, over at Zeno's there's a DVD for the Thunderbolt:
"Uncrating and Assembly of the P-47 Thunderbolt (40:00)This truly remarkable step-by-step training film shows how a ground support crew of fifty men could assemble a P-47 in a field using nothing more than muscle, unpowered hand tools, and pieces of the shipping crate it came in. We're talking nothing more than hammers, wrenches and bicycle pumps! You'll also get a unique look at the inner workings of the big Jug as it is literally bolted together by field personnel. A must see for P-47 fans and shade tree mechanics alike!* "
I've seen the video, it's really amazing how they take P-47 out of some BIG crates and assemble a fully functional fighter is impressive.
meaning the wing cannot be removed in parts for later reassembly in the field, as shown on the A6M Zero being restored below.
Okay, I'm back. What I miss?
Two glaring errors?Okay, I'm back. What I miss?
At least two. Totally spaced out on U.S.S. Saratoga. I got caught up in the discussion and mentioned build flaws in HIJMS Shokaku. When did I become a naval architect? Got caught up in the discussion. Worst of all, I didn't write "IIRC" after stating HIJMS Shoho was hit by 5 torpedoes. A most grievous mistake for this forum. Finally, dumb joke about Attu.Two glaring errors?
I see that now.The Zero could be split at the rear fuselage just aft of the canopy and with the wing tips being folded and engine removed could easily be transported within a compact space. It was designed precisely for ease of transport.Dailfuselage centre section
I doubt the term "glaring" is appropriate here, "minor" is more in line with what you're describing, possibly even "unnoticeable".At least two. Totally spaced out on U.S.S. Saratoga. I got caught up in the discussion and mentioned build flaws in HIJMS Shokaku. When did I become a naval architect? Got caught up in the discussion. Worst of all, I didn't write "IIRC" after stating HIJMS Shoho was hit by 5 torpedoes. A most grievous mistake for this forum. Finally, dumb joke about Attu.
Okay, you won this round Gunn but I'll be back!I doubt the term "glaring" is appropriate here, "minor" is more in line with what you're describing, possibly even "unnoticeable".
You want glaring? I went to renew my drivers license this morning, and the way the questions were worded I almost admitted to being:
A). A convicted felon
B). Have been judged mentally incapable (OK, they might have a case for that one, just ask around here)
C). Addicted to hard narcotics such as cocaine or heroin
Fortunately I was able to use my wit and charm to convince the nice lady that I was none of the above, although she seemed unconvinced where B was concerned.
Okay, you won this round Gunn but I'll be back!
I have seen a number of examples where the crates were reused by Ground Crew to make better class accommodation than provided by their air force. The most impressive being 8th Air Force crew who did a lot better than the standard issue Nissen Huts.It's smart to make your aircraft capable of being knocked down and reassembled in the field. Japan's main fighters, the A6M, Ki-43 and Ki-44 had mono-spar or monolithic wings, meaning the wing cannot be removed in parts for later reassembly in the field, as shown on the A6M Zero being restored below. The wing is one big piece from tip to tip. The only three ways to get your Zeros and Oscars to forward bases is to fly them there, find a freighter with wide open decks, or use an aircraft carrier as a ferry, as was done with the Hiyo class of light fleets after Midway.
View attachment 594399
Legend Flyers Zero – Restoration Update
Here's a Hawker Hurricane coming out of its crate. One can imagine only a couple of hours needed to bolt on the wings, rudder and prop, top up the fluids and ammunition.
View attachment 594405
If only the below was the scene at Singapore in late summer 1941.
View attachment 594406
I imagine the wood used on those crates was repurposed and is probably framed in some Ghanaian houses today.
Mmmm... Not sure about that, the USN wasn't "baited" out to protect Midway, Nimitz et. al. were spoiling for a fight, he believed that his carriers and air crews were as good as the IJN.
The question remains, if IJN had availed itself of German radar and communications technology as the admiral suggests, could they have used it effectively, so early on the learning curve?
Good question! I think it might have. Insert two more carriers into the historical sequence of the actual battle, and the likely retaliatory strike against TF17 would likely have been devastating. There wasn't much CAP available over the American carriers, and they would likely have been overwhelmed.