Owner reunited with stolen '56 Thunderbird after 31 years

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules


Pacific Historian
Jun 4, 2005
Orange County, CA
Article - News - Owner reunited with stolen '56 Thunderbird after 31 years

Former owner raised a family, retired from career during car's long absence.
The Associated Press
PALO ALTO -- Ronald Leung thought he would never see his beloved 1956 Ford Thunderbird again after it was stolen from his auto-repair shop in 1976.

But the 59-year-old car aficionado was reunited with the classic car he treasured as a young man on Thursday – 31 years to the day after it was swiped from the Palo Alto parking lot.

"I was very shocked," said Leung, a retired sheriff's deputy who runs a car-rental business in Milpitas. "After 31 years, I thought that car was long-gone history, like the Roman Empire."

The California Highway Patrol recovered the Thunderbird – still in excellent condition – after a Ventura County woman tried to register it after buying the car on eBay from an Ohio seller. She contacted the CHP because the vehicle identification number listed on the car's title didn't exist in the California Department of Motor Vehicles registry.

CHP Officer Christopher Throgmorton located the true VIN and ran it through a CHP database that identified it as a stolen car from Palo Alto.

"It's in really good condition," Throgmorton said. "It looks like somebody had it refurbished. It's been restored."

Since the Thunderbird was stolen, Leung fathered two kids and retired from a two-decade career in law enforcement. He had bought the collectible in 1974 for about $1,500.

"I belong to a car club, and every time I look at a Thunderbird, I go, 'Oh, I had one of those!"' he said. "I have one son who's 30 and a daughter who's 26. It's unbelievable, that car is older in theft than they are in age."


Information from: San Francisco Chronicle, SF Gate: San Francisco Chronicle


  • 23car.large.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 1,181

Users who are viewing this thread