Sorry to say but the division of the Korean peninsula and the following Korean War were not Japanese business.The US sadly created an enemy with North Vietnam, but is the US solely to blame for aggression by N. Korea or China?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Sorry to say but the division of the Korean peninsula and the following Korean War were not Japanese business.The US sadly created an enemy with North Vietnam, but is the US solely to blame for aggression by N. Korea or China?
I think we have to differentiate between "Russia" and the former Soviet UnionSounds like "You must hate Russians because of the history" when we do not necessarily hate them.
Sounds like "You must hate Russians because of the history" when we do not necessarily hate them.
But was the US solely responsible for this? Did North Korea attack South Korea in June 1950? The division of Korea was part of the Moscow Conference of Foreign Ministers (US, UK, USSR) and was supposed to be temporary. The US did use Japan to flight against N Korea after 1950 but look how different the world was back then. And today, is Japan not threatened by North Korea?Sorry to say but the division of the Korean peninsula and the following Korean War were not Japanese business.
Sounds like "You must hate Russians because of the history" when we do not necessarily hate them.
Japan might make a really good strategic base for the Peoples Liberation Army's forces.Listen to the statements by Kim and Xi well. Their target is always US, not necessarily Japan.
That is a fate for a country which confronts to the continent.
Listen to the statements by Kim and Xi well. Their target is always US, not necessarily Japan.
That is a fate for a country which confronts to the continent.
Let's hope those missiles are Russian designs.Right, but look especially at Kim's actions, shooting missiles through Japanese airspace.
Let's hope those missiles are Russian designs.
What was that? I did not change any.Glad you brought back the Reisen avatar!
The 48 FA-50s might allow the transfer of MiG-29s but I doubt it.Well it's a nifty little jet and the South Koreans have been selling them. This could open the way for the Ukraine getting Polish MiG-29s but the delivery of these aircraft won't happen overnight, let alone setting up logistic support and training.
The 48 FA-50s might allow the transfer of MiG-29s but I doubt it.
The T-7 is still a couple of years away from initial service and the USAf is at the front of the queue.Should of bought the T-7.
I am sure it will have a light fighter variant similar to the T-38/F-5.
Timings. The earliest the FA-50s could realistically enter service would be 2024. Remember that they have to be built, trained for, be introduced to service etc before the MiG-29s would be able to be released. I can't see the Poles giving up a capability , even the MiGs, without a replacement first secured and in/entering service. If anything, a batch of additional F-16s would be more likely to trigger a Polish MiG transfer than the FA-50s.Not an argument, but why your doubts? I'm interested in hearing them.
The T-7 is still a couple of years away from initial service and the USAf is at the front of the queue.
Re the light fighter idea, there has been some thinking:
View attachment 679571