Recent Purchases (3 Viewers)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Received some decal sheets from Red Roo models in the mail today.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0530.JPG
    IMG_0530.JPG
    46.3 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_0531.JPG
    IMG_0531.JPG
    51.5 KB · Views: 50


Also Hurricane had the offset of 1.5° for the fin...

Hurricane fin offset.JPG


Also the F4U had a such offset about 2°...

F4U fin offset.jpg


As it is said, a such offset of a tailfin from the centerline was introduced to help compensate for engine torque. The Bf-109K's wooden vertical was flat on one side and curved on the other. Contrary to that Italians made one wing slightly longer than the other.
 
Last edited:
Oh I have criss-crossed my post about the Hurricane with Terry's one.
 
Nope. It was done in order to retain a balanced airflow over the tail surfaces. The short distance between the propeller shaft centre-line and aft fuselage top-decking led to the use of a small in diamater four-blade prop to take an adventage of the available power. The hub was thus only about ten feet from the intersection of the fin and the tailplane. Therefore the engine nacelle was angled to starboard what was more suitable solution in a low-speed aircraft than more common cambering of a fin and rudder.

And thank you Wurger for the info. Much appreciated sir.
 
Someone else may confirm or dispel this................

When WWII raceplanes are rebuilt, the tail is re-aligned to Inline with the centerline for less drag?
 
Someone else may confirm or dispel this................

When WWII raceplanes are rebuilt, the tail is re-aligned to Inline with the centerline for less drag?


To my knowledge ... yes, the tail is set inline with the centerline for the reason you mentioned above. In the way the cruising speed is increased a little bit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back