Russian Fighters

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

However this "big guns" had a poor rate of fire and lack of ammunition. Russian philosophy was lighten the aircraft, but i guess if mostly of the Russian pilots can deal with such things.

That's true, Ernst, but part of the philosophy was to use your maneuverability from your lightened plane to get close enough to the enemy to where you were sure to score some hits, without using too much ammo. And it didn't take too many hits from a 20mm and especially a 37mm cannon to bring down an airplane. Again, just a different philosophy from Western tactics. This philosophy was continued into the postwar era, with piston-engined aircraft like the La-9 and La-11, with their 23mm's on the nose, and the MiG's with their 23mm's and 37mm's again mounted on the nose (or 30mm's in the case of the MiG-19 mounted on the nose and wingroots).

Venganza
 
more table:-
 

Attachments

  • Image3.jpg
    Image3.jpg
    67.5 KB · Views: 525
  • Image4.jpg
    Image4.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 520
  • Image5.jpg
    Image5.jpg
    88.5 KB · Views: 506
  • Image6.jpg
    Image6.jpg
    93.9 KB · Views: 512
  • Image7.jpg
    Image7.jpg
    111.9 KB · Views: 511
  • t12.jpg
    t12.jpg
    48.1 KB · Views: 518
  • t11.jpg
    t11.jpg
    140.5 KB · Views: 522
  • t10.jpg
    t10.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 520
  • Image9.jpg
    Image9.jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 514
  • Image8.jpg
    Image8.jpg
    104.7 KB · Views: 524
Performance charts:
 

Attachments

  • ae5.jpg
    ae5.jpg
    105.3 KB · Views: 475
  • ae4.jpg
    ae4.jpg
    117.1 KB · Views: 464
  • ae3.jpg
    ae3.jpg
    117.8 KB · Views: 483
  • ae2.jpg
    ae2.jpg
    122.3 KB · Views: 629
  • ae1.jpg
    ae1.jpg
    104 KB · Views: 705
Some more:
 

Attachments

  • ae6.jpg
    ae6.jpg
    164.6 KB · Views: 448
  • New Image.GIF
    New Image.GIF
    75 KB · Views: 464
  • New Image2.GIF
    New Image2.GIF
    75 KB · Views: 455
  • P105.gif
    P105.gif
    78.5 KB · Views: 451
  • P105_2.gif
    P105_2.gif
    59.9 KB · Views: 531
Hey Timpa, nice charts. Where did you got them? Are they from Russian reports? It likes FW 190 D-9 were plotted with maximum engine output without use of MW-50

109541.jpg
.
 
Last edited:
Hey Timpa, nice charts.
Very nice, yes...

Where did you got them?
From "Samoliotostroïeniyé", the TsAGI book, Jookovski editions. That's the limit (for T and others) to send datas even without knowing where there a taken from. In that case, a copiright (c) should be mentionned...

Are they from Russian reports?
Yes, they are. Soviets used a full half squadron of captured Doras.

It likes FW 190 D-9 were plotted with maximum engine output without use of MW-50
It's seems so. Other indicators from the book, page 95:

631 km/h at 6150 m
(642 km/h at 6100 m) "forced" rating

Mentions of power at rated alt:
1480 hp
(1600 hp combat rating)

109541.jpg
.[/QUOTE]

Regards
 
Very nice, yes...


From "Samoliotostroïeniyé", the TsAGI book, Jookovski editions. That's the limit (for T and others) to send datas even without knowing where there a taken from. In that case, a copiright (c) should be mentionned...


Yes, they are. Soviets used a full half squadron of captured Doras.


It's seems so. Other indicators from the book, page 95:

631 km/h at 6150 m
(642 km/h at 6100 m) "forced" rating

Mentions of power at rated alt:
1480 hp
(1600 hp combat rating)

109541.jpg
.



8) Have been idle for some days. Late smile, thank you!
 
Last edited:
It likes FW 190 D-9 were plotted with maximum engine output without use of MW-50

It's seems so. Other indicators from the book, page 95:

631 km/h at 6150 m
(642 km/h at 6100 m) "forced" rating

Mentions of power at rated alt:
1480 hp
(1600 hp combat rating)

Thanks for the data. Does the book state the condition of the aircraft (fair, serviceable, very good...)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back