- Thread starter
-
- #41
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Yes, but that's the fuel burn no matter if they're operating from Southampton, Gibraltar, Alexandria or Singapore. The Far East CBG isn't expected to conduct distant USN-like Pacific ops. The enemy is right on their gates in Japanese-held FIC, there's no need to travel far. Instead the pre-war RN carriers are operating in the Gulf of Thailand and South China Sea, close to fuel supplies in Singapore and Hong Kong, where they are monitoring IJN and IJA movements.as a further comment on the aviation fuel situation. A Swordfish carried about 167 imp gallons of fuel in it's standard tanks, long range tanks could be fitted, a 60imp gallon tank in the cockpit when carrying a torpedo if range was needed or a larger (69imp G?) tank in place of the torpedo for recconasance duties.
If we assume a fuel capacity of 236imp gallons per plane and using an 8 plane search pattern twice a day we are using 3776imp gallons a day. The old carrier with a bit over 17,000 gallons is good for about 4 days worth of searches and bit more, but is conducting no other air activities.
Then what is the point except to show that British carrier crews can die as bravely as British battleship crews?This will likely be where at least one, if not all three carriers will perish.
You don't need carriers to launch attacks on the landing beaches at either Pattani or Kota Bharu. You need airfields on Penang Island. It's about 210 miles to either location. You need Fortress Penang as much as Fortress Singapore. You need radar there to help you intercept incoming raids, you need an Observer Corps located between Penang and the two landing beaches. You need fighters with a 200 mile radius of action to escort your strike aircraft. That means you need Hurricane IIb's equipped with 2 x 45 IG drop tanks, or Buffalo I's fully loaded with fuel and vulnerable in a dogfight from the moment they take off. I'd prefer Hurricanes. You don't need a bunch of vulnerable old aircraft carriers. You need medivac transports to send out resupplies and evacuate the wounded defenders of the landing beaches, so either Bristol Bombay or HP Harrows. Your bombers need to be able to dive bomb, and be able to drop mines and torpedoes. I'd suggest the HP Hampden. It was almost as fast as the Ki-27's defending the invasion force. The Hayabusas were used for air superiority, escorting bombers attacking our airfields. So maybe some Hurricane IIa's to defend Penang Island itself, maybe Hurricane IIc's with long range tanks for ground attack.Yes, but that's the fuel burn no matter if they're operating from Gibraltar, Alexandria or Singapore. The Far East CBG isn't expected to conduct distant USN-like Pacific ops. The enemy is right on their gates in Japanese-held FIC, there's no need to travel far. Instead the pre-war RN carriers are operating in the Gulf of Thailand and South China Sea, close to fuel supplies in Singapore and Hong Kong, where they are monitoring IJN and IJA movements. Once the fighting starts, the carriers will again be in the Gulf of Thailand to stop any amphibious assaults from FIC or Thailand into Malaya. This will likely be where at least one, if not all three carriers will perish.
You keep posting with shopping lists of what's needed, rather than considering how to utilize what we've got, i.e. three slow and small carriers. Certainly we should coordinate with the RAF to counter the Japanese landings on Malaya. Hopefully the carriers can keep whatever RN surface units were sent (I'm not sure under these circumstances that PoW is sent to Malaya at all) out of easy range of IJAF strike bombers.You don't need carriers to launch attacks on the landing beaches at either Pattani or Kota Bharu. You need airfields on Penang Island. It's about 210 miles to either location. You need Fortress Penang as much as Fortress Singapore. You need radar there to help you intercept incoming raids, you need an Observer Corps located between Penang and the two landing beaches. You need fighters with a 200 mile radius of action to escort your strike aircraft. That means you need Hurricane IIb's equipped with 2 x 45 IG drop tanks, or Buffalo I's fully loaded with fuel and vulnerable in a dogfight from the moment they take off. I'd prefer Hurricanes. You don't need a bunch of vulnerable old aircraft carriers. You need medivac transports to send out resupplies and evacuate the wounded defenders of the landing beaches, so either Bristol Bombay or HP Harrows. Your bombers need to be able to dive bomb, and be able to drop mines and torpedoes. I'd suggest the HP Hampden. It was almost as fast as the Ki-27's defending the invasion force. The Hayabusas were used for air superiority, escorting bombers attacking our airfields. So maybe some Hurricane IIa's to defend Penang Island itself, maybe Hurricane IIc's with long range tanks for ground attack.
You can't effectively use 3 slow and small carriers. Their combined air strength is inadequate.You keep posting with shopping lists of what's needed, rather than considering how to utilize what we've got, i.e. three slow and small carriers. Certainly we should coordinate with the RAF to counter the Japanese landings on Malaya. Hopefully the carriers can keep whatever RN surface units were sent (im not sure PoW is sent to Malaya at all) out of easy range of IJAF strike bombers.
Perhaps Eagle could have Fulmars for fighter recce and Albacores for strike. Argus has Sea Hurricanes. Hermes has Swordfish for ASW. Lose one and your doomed.You can't effectively use 3 slow and small carriers. Their combined air strength is inadequate.
Penang Island is the perfect unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Indian Ocean able to attack the Japanese invasion forces on the East Coast of Malaya and Siam.You would also need a solid ASW plan because the IJN had a substantial sub presence in the region and those carriers were painfully slow.
By late 1941 the British are the leaders in ASW. Hopefully both the FAA Swordfish and the destroyer escorts sent along with the carriers have their best anti-sub game on.You would also need a solid ASW plan because the IJN had a substantial sub presence in the region and those carriers were painfully slow.
Hopefully the carriers can keep whatever RN surface units were sent (im not sure PoW is sent to Malaya at all) out of easy range of IJAF strike bombers.
They may have been world leaders in 1941 but that is more the one eyed man with cataracts leading the totally blind. British ASW in 1941/early 42 was a far cry from what it would be in 1943/44.By late 1941 the British are the leaders in ASW. Hopefully both the FAA Swordfish and the destroyer escorts sent along with the carriers have their best anti-sub game on.
True, you have to go within harm's reach in order to have any chance of attacking the invasion ships. But if Force Z has carriers, it doesn't need to position its ships within easy reach of IJNAF strike squadrons.It was the IJNAS that they had to worry about. View attachment 565134
If they stayed out of the range of these aircraft they stayed out of range of attacking the invasion ships.
My fault, meant to hit agree on my Blackberry's small screen. Fixed it. Why do we have a dumb button?Post #51 is dumb just like that?
I agree, the RN still has a way to go on ASW, but hopefully some of the destroyer captains and ASW specialists sent to Malaya in 1941 are veterans of the fighting the U-Boats. Looking at U-Boat losses, 1941 does show improvement over 1940 Chart of U-boat losses - Fates - German U-boats of WWII - Kriegsmarine - uboat.net. But you're right, 1943 shows massive improvement for the Allies, also more U-boats to sink.They may have been world leaders in 1941 but that is more the one eyed man with cataracts leading the totally blind. British ASW in 1941/early 42 was a far cry from what it would be in 1943/44.
I agree, it should have been made into the main RAF air base and fortress. Imagine wave after wave of Bristol Beaufighters and Hampdens flying from there, with radar-directed Spitfires or Hurricanes. It's better placed than Singapore for the RN's primary base - I wonder if it was ever considered? Too swampy perhaps? Though more likely that only Singapore Island was ceded to the British, with Penang Island remaining under the Sultan's control, albeit with British "protection".Penang Island is the perfect unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Indian Ocean able to attack the Japanese invasion forces on the East Coast of Malaya and Siam.
Penang like Singapore was a colony as was Malacca, Dinding, Christmas Island, Cocos Islands and Labuan, so we could have done whatever we wanted to.I agree, it should have been made into the main RAF air base and fortress. Imagine wave after wave of Bristol Beaufighters and Hampdens flying from there, with radar-directed Spitfires or Hurricanes. It's better placed than Singapore for the RN's primary base - I wonder if it was ever considered? Too swampy perhaps? Though more likely that only Singapore Island was ceded to the British, with Penang Island remaining under the Sultan's control, albeit with British "protection".
It's ridiculous how Percival ordered the withdrawal from the Island and evacuation of its white population. What sort of message did that send to the locals? Unlike the Victorian-era Lei Yue Mun Fort in Hong Kong, where the British, Canadians and other CW troops fought to the last man, I don't think Fort Cornwallis fired a single shot.
I toured both the Hong Kong fort and the British/CW war cemetery in 2018 and the place is very moving, you can see bullet holes in the Lei Yue Mun Fort's trench and bastions.
Instead of wasting money on building the Singapore naval base, perhaps smaller bases for both naval and RAF could be built in Penang, and across British Pacific territories. Just look at how many islands Britain controlled, but with little investment in their defence or use as a barrier to defend Australia, etc.Penang like Singapore was a colony as was Malacca, Dinding, Christmas Island, Cocos Islands and Labuan, so we could have done whatever we wanted to.
Straits Settlements - Wikipedia