Spitfires or 5 Series Italian fighters (More beautiful)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

listen to yourself

the spit also had the long nose which you hold in such high regard, was considderably deadlier and whilst maintaining that oh so British grace has the aggression of a -190 (now that's a lot of aggression...), she looks like she wants to be up in the air, nose up high, sniffing out the enemy..........
 
Sure!
Compared with the longer-nosed IMAM Ro-58 it proved it's inferiority.

Longing the nose have a tremendous effect on an aircraft deadliness. Even the Americans understood this, so, they longered the nose of the P-38 beyond the strict necessity.

DogW
 
And who can forget the beautiful Macchi Mc.202. Depiction of Sergeant Major Ennio Tarantola and his mount, "DAI BANANA!" racking up his eighth aerial victory.

 

That's funny! Kind of like how a Beech 17 morphs into something ugly when one releases any back-pressure during the landing rollout.
Anyway, the Jag is a gorgeous car and the Porsche lovers think it's hideous. I think the 911 looks like an ugly frog.

The Italian fighters are pretty, but I always liked the MC-200 best.
I like the MkII and PRXIX Spitfires best.
I like C model Mustangs best. Prototype P-51 was just beautiful too.
YP-38's too. FW-190A-1 through 3. BF-109F. P-47D razorback with wing pylons and Lockheed tanks. I got a million favorites...

Chris...
 
The Reggiane 2005 is a very beautiful fighter, one of the most beautiful, but I like the looks of the Spitfire XIV just abit better. I'm not particularly fond of any of the early Spitfire marks though..
 
Yeah, instead of off-setting the rudder one wing was longer than the other to counteract torque. Weren't they clever little buggers.
Vote Spit PR
 

Users who are viewing this thread