Erich
the old Sage
I see the myth keeps on reliving itself in post # 237, Ta's protecting LW jets and their A/F's. this thread should be put away in the archiv's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I'm wondering too now, it's on my favourites (the site) but I can't find it.
I have a better one with the RR Nene which is probably true -
"Stanley Hooker, who had been in charge of the Rolls-Royce design team that refined the Derwent, visited the US in the spring of 1944, and found that General Electric was developing two turbojet engines with thrust ratings of 17.6 kN (1,800 kg / 4,000 lb) or higher. Hooker, realizing that the British had been thinking small, went back to Britain and initiated a fast track project to build a new, much more powerful centrifugal-flow engine.
The result was the "RB.41 Nene", which was first bench-tested in October 1944 and provided 22.3 kN (2,270 kg / 5,000 lb) thrust. The Nene was the world's most powerful engine at the time, and it was also simple, cheap, and reliable. The Nene was made in large numbers, with versions made in Canada, Australia, France, the US, and the USSR.
The Nene was such a good engine that Rolls-Royce decided to build a scaled-down version, which was designated the "Derwent 5" though it had little direct relationship to earlier Derwent marks. The Derwent 5 was first bench-tested in June 1945, with the test engine providing 11.8 kN (1,200 kg / 2,650 lb) thrust. "
I don't think so. 3 to 1 conservative estimates, 6 to 1 including Chinese and North Koreans. The F-86 was a major distributor of used MiG-15 parts.Yep, great engine the Nene - so good that the Brits in their wisdom gave one to the Soviets, who produced it as the Klimov VK-1, wrapped it in the Mig 15 and sent the whole package back to bite everyone on the bum in Korea...
Bummer! I like to get in on a good argument! And these sort of things are some of my favorites. Personally, I like the P-38 as top dog over all and the Me-109 if restricted to a single engine. The first because of it's potential and the second because of it's demonstrated effects.Unfortunately I doubt you will get any responses from them. The posts you are referring to were written more the 7 years ago, and some of these members are no longer active.
Bummer! I like to get in on a good argument!
As long as you keep it civil...