Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
CV90 is better. And it carries the infantry in the back.They would be handy for infantry support.
Yeah but it doesn't look as cool as a Stug.CV90 is better. And it carries the infantry in the back.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=664F-Nfmltc&pp=ygUOQ3Y5MCAyNSByb3VuZHM%3D
Very true.Yeah but it doesn't look as cool as a Stug.
Interesting vid on the T-72.Ukraine has lost around 62 T64 and replaced them with an upgrade to 119 T 72 thanks to Russian tankers having abandonment issues.
I guess no one is bringing back the casemate tank.
Indeed. A German casemate tank once again rolling across Ukraine would be noteworthy.I wonder if Germany still has any West German KanonenJagdPanzers still in storage?
They looked remarkably close to the Jagdpanzer IV and sported a 90mm AT main gun.
In hindsight, NATO should have followed the Russian example and instead of scrapping its Leo1s, Chieftains, M-60s, etc., store them.They were all converted which involved removing the gun. About 25% became Jaguar 2 equipped with TOW and the rest Observation/training.
Apart from museum pieces they are likely all scrapped now.
In hindsight, NATO should have followed the Russian example and instead of scrapping its Leo1s, Chieftains, M-60s, etc., store them.
I'm not sure a well modernized Chieftain, Challenger 1, Leo1 or M60 would be obsolete in this war.You know what's harder to replace than a tank?
A trained tank crew who got cooked in an obsolete tank.
I'm not sure a well modernized Chieftain, Challenger 1, Leo1 or M60 would be obsolete in this war.
The reactivated T-55's going into the Russian lines were my first thought on this one.You know what's harder to replace than a tank?
A trained tank crew who got cooked in an obsolete tank.
The reactivated T-55's going into the Russian lines were my first thought on this one.
That argument is that all MBTs are obsolete.Mines and drones ...