Admiral Beez
1st Lieutenant
The ambiguity is gone, replaced by a defacto security guarantee of Taiwan.
So, now what? Will the USN move a CBG or ARG to Taiwan?
So, now what? Will the USN move a CBG or ARG to Taiwan?
This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
True, but it’s not exactly the same as Japan or South Korea where the US maintains a garrison. Now that would settle the ambiguity.Not really any ambiguity. Every time China has indulged any serious saber rattling about Taiwan the US has deployed a carrier group and/or other significant naval assets to the area. The implication was clear that we would take military action if China attacked Taiwan. China knows this. The only difference now is Biden just transmitted it in the clear.
In the absence of a defence pact like NATO, the West expects Taiwan to fight for themselves and will support them materially. That sounds pretty fair to me.Taiwanese are disappointed with the current Ukraine situation as it has turned out that the western support means their own sacrifice for the western benefits. Taiwan will be absorbed into China by negotiation someday. Chinese don't hurry for the result.
On the Taiwan/China subject, this morning it was reported that the China plan for invasion was leaked and it contained all the details of #of ships, troops, airfields, gas stations and etc. right down to how many blood stations would be required.
That is the way it should be, but as in so many instances the USA want's to be the author.You can't write a story for them, Admiral, as they will write it by themselves.
That is the way it should be, but as in so many instances the USA want's to be the author.
Biden's last statement is in clear breach of the existing China-US treaties and agreements, and it comes at a time where there is absolutely no proof of China preparing to attack Taiwan.In the case of Taiwan, America has historically practiced ambiguity since the Nixon rapprochement with Beijing, so I'm not sure this is relevant. We've sold the Taiwanese weapons but until he last few months avoided direct statements of military support. It's now open that we had SpecOps troops there, a hundred or so.
And polling shows a solid support for independence from PRC.
Do you have any data on Taiwanese polling to support your point?
This leak, probably.Do you have a link to the article reporting this?
Maybe you want to show me your source that shows a majority of Taiwanese opting for war.
Biden's last statement is in clear breach of the existing China-US treaties and agreements, and it comes at a time where there is absolutely no proof of China preparing to attack Taiwan.
Since Taipei is governed by a multi-party system - they have elections and changing agendas all the time - presently the ruling party is eying with independence. (And the USA has been doing it's utmost to cause, aggravate and exploit this situation).
Everyone especially the Taiwanese population is aware that an attempt towards independence will not be tolerated by China - in the worst case it means war.
And independent of polling's towards independence (simply showing a present state of mood or conviction), going to war about it, is a totally different issue.
Maybe you want to show me your source that shows a majority of Taiwanese opting for war.
What's your point?.....However, asked whether they would fight against China if it attacked after Taiwan declared independence, the percentage of respondents who said they would fight fell to 62.7 percent, while 26.7 percent said they would not fight and 10.6 percent had no response, foundation president Huang Yu-lin (黃玉霖) told a news conference in Taipei hosted by the government-affiliated foundation.
The results suggest that the proportion of Taiwanese opposing unification is larger than those advocating Taiwanese independence, said Eric Yu (俞振華), a research fellow at National Chengchi University's (NCCU) Election Study Center.[/i]
What's your point?
My point is:
The USA has signed off onto the one country 2 systems policy - which is exactly the present case in regards to China and its province of Taiwan. So for the USA to instigate and actively promote/support separatism and additionally propagating anti-China sentiments in the world by spreading falsehood about China in general only demonstrates plain dishonesty and a warmongering attitude.
So tell me what serves the people on Taiwan better? - to keep the existing policy which provides/garuantees for their own independent governmental administration and democratic rights and livelihood, or to loose all this plus their own lives because of a war which the USA is trying it's best at to instigate?
Yes we all know that is presently the case - so why do try to keep making a point out of it?My point is that the Taiwanese public opinion is not in favor of reunification -- which is what you in fact asked me to support, so I did. Why did you ask me to support a point if you didn't know that point? Indeed, you misrepresented it at first.
Everytime the USA is sending a high ranking politician to Taiwan - it belongs to China, so no outsider politician has a right to even go there (not even to mention spreading support towards segregation) - other then invited by Beijing. Look at the USA or Australia's reaction towards the e.g. China's Confucius institutes in those countries.Is America actively supporting separatism?
You really that naive? or you just want to play games? for my part I am not interested in such games.As for "falsehoods about China", could you be specific? What lies is America spreading?
Link your sources.
That is because you don't want to see it. - e.g. the USA declaring military action and support towards a separatist movement in another country.Again, I don't see America trying to instigate a war. Indeed,
So the USA sending military aircraft and spy-planes into other countries airspace is different? China is not allowed to have an amphibious force to protect their outlying territories?I see China building a force-structure specifically designed to attack Taiwan and at the same time deny any aid coming to the island. Whether we're talking about the artificial bases followed by sovereign-water claims, or A2/AD missiles, or the continual and escalating probes of Taiwan's airspace, it looks to me like China is at least as aggressive as you claim America is -- yet you're oddly silent about that.
Silly statement - no one is willing to die for freedom other then a minority of fanatics and politician talking and inciting bullocks.As for what serves the Taiwanese better, I'll go with their own self-determination. If they prefer fighting and dying for their freedom, that's their decision to make.
You don't seem to understand the fundamental difference between HK (a former colony-obtained via open threat of force) being returned to China and Taiwan being an existing province of China with it's own elected democracy, administration and security forces.I'm sure the Chinese will give them that, just as they did Hong Kong <snort>