cheddar cheese
Major General
What do you think the best 190 variant is?
The Best Fw-190 Variant...?
- Thread starter cheddar cheese
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Napier Sabre
Airman
In terms of looks or performance?
- Thread starter
- #3
cheddar cheese
Major General
Performance 
We done the thread on looks a while back...
We done the thread on looks a while back...
CharlesBronson
Senior Master Sergeant
FW-190 G-3, best german Figther-bomber.
2 x 300l droptanks
1 x AB 500 small arms dispenser.
2x Mauser Mg-151/20 with 200 rounds
Range circa 1200 km
What more do you need...?
2 x 300l droptanks
1 x AB 500 small arms dispenser.
2x Mauser Mg-151/20 with 200 rounds
Range circa 1200 km
What more do you need...?
- Thread starter
- #6
cheddar cheese
Major General
Ill be going for the F-8 8)
All around the Fw-190D-9! She was the prettiest of the 190's and had great performance.
Type: Fighter Fighter/Bomber
Origin: Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau Gmbh.
Models: D series
First Flight: Late 1942
Final Delivery: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine:
Model: Junkers Jumo 213A-1
Type: Water-Cooled Inverted V12 Number: One
Horsepower: 1,776 hp (2,240 hp Emergency Boost)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 34 ft. 5½ in. (10.50m)
Wing Surface Area: 196.99 Sq. Ft. (18.30m²)
Length: 33 ft. 5¼ in. (10.2m)
Height: 11 ft. 0¼ in. (3.35m)
Weights:
Empty: 3,500 kg (7,720 lbs.)
Loaded: 4,840 kg (10,670 lbs.)
Performance:
Maximum Speed: 440mph (704km/h)
Cruise Speed: N/A
Range: 560 miles (900km)
Initial Climb: 3,300 ft. (1000m) Per Minute
Endurance: N/A
Service Ceiling: 32,810 ft. (10,000m)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Two 13mm MG 131 above engine
Two 20mm MG 151/20 in wing roots
Bomb Load:
One 1,100 lb. (500 kg) bomb on centerline.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments:
The Dora 9 went into production in the Autumn of 1944. The mating of a bomber engine to a fighter airframe resulted in an extremely fast aircraft. Later the D-models were redesignated the Ta 152.
Type: Fighter Fighter/Bomber
Origin: Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau Gmbh.
Models: D series
First Flight: Late 1942
Final Delivery: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine:
Model: Junkers Jumo 213A-1
Type: Water-Cooled Inverted V12 Number: One
Horsepower: 1,776 hp (2,240 hp Emergency Boost)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 34 ft. 5½ in. (10.50m)
Wing Surface Area: 196.99 Sq. Ft. (18.30m²)
Length: 33 ft. 5¼ in. (10.2m)
Height: 11 ft. 0¼ in. (3.35m)
Weights:
Empty: 3,500 kg (7,720 lbs.)
Loaded: 4,840 kg (10,670 lbs.)
Performance:
Maximum Speed: 440mph (704km/h)
Cruise Speed: N/A
Range: 560 miles (900km)
Initial Climb: 3,300 ft. (1000m) Per Minute
Endurance: N/A
Service Ceiling: 32,810 ft. (10,000m)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Two 13mm MG 131 above engine
Two 20mm MG 151/20 in wing roots
Bomb Load:
One 1,100 lb. (500 kg) bomb on centerline.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments:
The Dora 9 went into production in the Autumn of 1944. The mating of a bomber engine to a fighter airframe resulted in an extremely fast aircraft. Later the D-models were redesignated the Ta 152.
Attachments
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
as soon as i read that i didn't even bother reading the rest of that post...........
Dont tell me you think the A looks better? If you say that you are on crack!
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
you weren't here for that disscussion then?? yes the A was better looking..........
Actually I was here for it but you are not in your right mind the A was not as sleek looking and was more menacing looking, however the Dora was just beautfiful you are out of your mind! It also had better performance.
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
performance wise yes the D was better but in no way was the D better looking than the A...............
Sorry my friend yes the D was better looking! But this can go on forever, believe what you may and to each there own.
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
you're only saying that because you know you're wrong........
Erich
the old Sage
geez not again guys !!!
the A-8 version was the heavy hitter against bombers, the Dora was used in interceptor work with P-51's and a stop gap till the Ta 152 could fill the ranks which never happened we know
▼
the A-8 version was the heavy hitter against bombers, the Dora was used in interceptor work with P-51's and a stop gap till the Ta 152 could fill the ranks which never happened we know
▼
- Thread starter
- #17
cheddar cheese
Major General
Soren said:No one can be wrong about 'looks', as "Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder"
Of course people can be wrong about looks
The poll clearly showed that peeople prefer the D's sleek, beautiful styling to the A's Short, stubby styling (Actually no, thats cruel to the A, it did look very good, just not as good as the D)Anyway, lets get back off the subject of looks and on to the subject in hand
Dont take me wrong, I think the A looked great but the Dora was just beautiful. And yes the Dora was a better aircraft too. As Erich said they were used for 2 different roles also, but the Dora was the better all around aircraft and yes Lanc looked better!
KraziKanuK
Banned
- 792
- Jan 26, 2005
The Dora 9 better than an A-9?
