Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
In "Tomcat" by Paul Gilchrist, "The F14D with half a load of internal fuel (8200 pounds) two Sparrow and Two Sidewinder missiles(1400 pounds) in a fighter escort mission configuration has a wind loading, with wings swept of only about 55 pounds per square foot. This is comparable to the Mig 21 and much better than that of the F15, F16 or F/A18 by a long shot." "That is why the F14s with the new engines(F14Aplus, F14B and F14D) are able to beat up so easily on new generation airplanes like the F16, F15 and F/A18." " It is the unique combination of low wing loading, high thrust to weight ratio and high Ps which yields what I call agility."
When one reads Gilchrist's book and realises how Congress and the Navy screwed up the development of the F14 it is a calamity. The vast majority of the F14s were built with engines which were supposed to be only interim engines and that everyone knew were inadequate. The losses of AC not to mention air crew during the Tomcat's lifetime caused by the bad engines cost many millions and the Tomcat only reached it's full potential with the last production models. Then the mistakes were compounded by choosing the Super Hornet over new manufactured Strike Tomcats.
what trainer would that beThe F-86 Sabre's reputation suffers from the eternal humiliation of getting waxed so frequently by what is essentially an armed trainer. The Sabre is a beautiful aircraft with many fine attributes and accomplishments, but sometimes "One ah-shucks, equals a hundred attaboys".
.
I don't know what you're basing that statement on as the F-86 maintained a very good to excellent kill ratio from Korea thru its post war service. The F-86 was deployed during a time where air to air losses were expected due to the simplistic nature of this second generation fighter and the rules of engagement it was placed in. Depending who's numbers you believe the F-86 maintained anywhere from a 3 to 1 to a 6 to 1 kill ratio and even took on and shot down Hawker Hunters and MiG-21s over India/ Pakistan. Many times during Korea the F-86 was outnumbered upwards to 5 to 1 and despite the poor skill of some of the communist pilots UN forces encountered during Korea, the F-86 was constantly fighting at a disadvantage and winning.IThe F-86 Sabre's reputation suffers from the eternal humiliation of getting waxed so frequently by what is essentially an armed trainer. The Sabre is a beautiful aircraft with many fine attributes and accomplishments, but sometimes "One ah-shucks, equals a hundred attaboys"
I think Gilchrist has more to back up his statements than just paper performance. He flew 167 combat missions over Vietnam. Commanded a fleet fighter squadron on three different deployments. He flew during his 33 year flying career 71 different foreign and domestic tactical aircraft icluding the F15 and F16. At age 51 he became the first flag officer to land a Tomcat on a carrier and had more than 400 hours in the Tomcat. During an air show in Gunnison, CO in around 1994 I talked to the pilot of an F14D who had flown in there. He said they could wax any F15 or F16 and felt sure they could take the Mig29 or SU27. I would not expect him to say anything else but Gilcrist's testimony seems to add weight.
There is a marked difference in the various Sabres the US ones were not the equal of the Aussie or Canadian versionsHello Richard,
I was not in anyway referring to Gilchrist's lack of credibility. Please note I wrote that you both may be right. "On paper performance" as in quantifiable performance. "Real World Issues" as in not enough on paper performance superiority to overwhelm superior political performance to get dollars spent on the not obviously inferior enough Super Hornet.
How's the weather in Prescott on this last day of the monsoon? Down here its windy and we may get some rain.
Steve
There is a marked difference in the various Sabres the US ones were not the equal of the Aussie or Canadian versions
Your post indicated it was a reply to two people and that was the 2 previous posts that enquired on your Sabre being waxed by a TrainerI am not sure why you made this reply to my reply to renrich about ADM Gilchrist and the F-14.
You are right about the U.S. Sabres not being the equal to the Aussie or Canadian versions. By the way it was Canadian versions that got waxed several times by the equivalent of an armed trainer. What unexpected ignominy to be borne by a bird full of pride.
Provide data!I am not sure why you made this reply to my reply to renrich about ADM Gilchrist and the F-14.
You are right about the U.S. Sabres not being the equal to the Aussie or Canadian versions. By the way it was Canadian versions that got waxed several times by the equivalent of an armed trainer. What unexpected ignominy to be borne by a bird full of pride.
I am not sure why you made this reply to my reply to renrich about ADM Gilchrist and the F-14.
You are right about the U.S. Sabres not being the equal to the Aussie or Canadian versions. By the way it was Canadian versions that got waxed several times by the equivalent of an armed trainer. What unexpected ignominy to be borne by a bird full of pride.
The English Electric Lightning absolute performance is still 'secret' but it is rumoured to be as good as the Mig-25 by some quarters.
I cant recall the Lightning in air combat.
Neither can I. The EEL is a magnificent jet fighter and a another example of a superb fast interceptor.
I voted for the Harrier. Not the most elegant but, so versatile and deadly.
Its performance in the Falklands Conflict has sealed its place in aviation history.
It was a true British first and one to be proud of...especially as the sun has set on our industry to all intents and purpose.
AND we beat the American aero industry in getting a variable jet thrust system to work and prove itself in battle.
Hawker Siddeley Harrier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cheers
John
alright you keep talking about the Sabre getting waxed by a trainer the only inference I can possibly see is a Gnat and its origins are as a light fighter. Now your talking about the Lightnings combat record please elaborate, the Lightning was a very short legged interceptor with fantastic numbers but if you had a large area to protect was as useful as a rubber crutchMagnificent and superb are excellent definitions for the Lightning! The Lightning is truly intimidating in appearance, a attribute enhanced by the fact nothing looks like a Lightning. Your F-86, F-15, F-14, Arrow, etc. all look similar to other aircraft to the point of being generic in appearance. The Lightning is a unique masterpiece. It is not just about looks either, the Lightning has intimidating performance. It has one of the best types of victory to loss records of all the candidates in this poll. Furthermore, it has never been humiliated like the Sabre was by what appeared to be an inferior opponent.
With regard to beating the American aero industry: It was not the first time and I doubt it will be the last. See number 4 below.
the Lightning was a very short legged interceptor with fantastic numbers but if you had a large area to protect was as useful as a rubber crutch