GrauGeist
Generalfeldmarschall zur Luftschiff Abteilung
You're right, Matt...they'll term any of the above listed loads as "excessive force" and the legal adventure begins.
It's a rare case when a homeowner or potential victim prevails over the local District Attorney or public sentiment in a defensive shooting. The current mentality is that no matter how much in danger the potential victim was in, he/she used a horrible gun to a protect themselves. That makes them pretty much the criminal in this case, even if the assailant was a felon hopped up on dope packing a stolen weapon. The media will villify the defender and show how wonderful the bad guy was and the prosecuting attornet will scrape and pry to find anything that will amplify just how viscious the defender was.
They will take the facts from the shooting incident (how many shots fired, what type of weapon/ammo used on the bad guy, did the bad guy have a weapon and if so, what type was it fired?), then they'll go and look for bumper stickers (even NRA can be damning), clever signs (like Matt mentioned), hunting club memberships, profile the type of weapons that are found in the defender's home (how many shotguns, are there military weapons/memorabelia?, etc) and build up a profile to the jury that they weren't defending themselves, they were out to kill...period.
It's cool to see the goodguys in the movies put the hurt on the badguys with all sorts of wicked firepower and stunning killshots while expending several thousand rounds per episode, but the real world can be turned upside down with a single gunshot...
It's a rare case when a homeowner or potential victim prevails over the local District Attorney or public sentiment in a defensive shooting. The current mentality is that no matter how much in danger the potential victim was in, he/she used a horrible gun to a protect themselves. That makes them pretty much the criminal in this case, even if the assailant was a felon hopped up on dope packing a stolen weapon. The media will villify the defender and show how wonderful the bad guy was and the prosecuting attornet will scrape and pry to find anything that will amplify just how viscious the defender was.
They will take the facts from the shooting incident (how many shots fired, what type of weapon/ammo used on the bad guy, did the bad guy have a weapon and if so, what type was it fired?), then they'll go and look for bumper stickers (even NRA can be damning), clever signs (like Matt mentioned), hunting club memberships, profile the type of weapons that are found in the defender's home (how many shotguns, are there military weapons/memorabelia?, etc) and build up a profile to the jury that they weren't defending themselves, they were out to kill...period.
It's cool to see the goodguys in the movies put the hurt on the badguys with all sorts of wicked firepower and stunning killshots while expending several thousand rounds per episode, but the real world can be turned upside down with a single gunshot...